Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27870394›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience research2017

Sex differences, gender and addiction.

Jill B Becker, Michele L McClellan, Beth Glover Reed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 314 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
314citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

314 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

254 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jill B BeckerDepartment of Psychology and the Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109.
Michele L McClellanDepartment of History and the Residential College, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109.
Beth Glover ReedSchool of Social Work and the Department of Women's Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109.

Funding

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN DRUG ABUSER01DA012677 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BECKER, JILL B. · 2000 to 2013
$3.6M
Neural Mechanisms of Propensity for Drug TakingR01DA039952 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BECKER, JILL B. · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Drug Abuse: Sex differences in developmental and environmental influencesR01DA023990 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BECKER, JILL B. · 2009 to 2010
$644k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012677NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023990NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses alcohol and other forms of drug addiction as both a sociocultural and biological phenomenon. Sex differences and gender are not solely determined by biology, nor are they entirely sociocultural. The interactions among biological, environmental, sociocultural, and developmental influences result in phenotypes that may be more masculine or more feminine. These gender-related sex differences in the brain can influence the responses to drugs of abuse, progressive changes in the brain after exposure to drugs of abuse and whether addiction results from drug-taking experiences. In addition, the basic laboratory evidence for sex differences is discussed within the context of four types of sex/gender differences. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsSubstance-Related DisordersBrainHumansSex Factorsaddictionanimal modelsgendersex differencessociocultural influences

Identifiers

PMID27870394
PMCPMC5120656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.