Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27870340›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2016

Developmental and Evolutionary Significance of the Zygomatic Bone.

Yann Heuzé, Kazuhiko Kawasaki, Tobias Schwarz, Jeffrey J Schoenebeck, Joan T Richtsmeier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03025763 (Craniosynostosis Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03025763 active not recruitingnot on this map

Craniosynostosis Network

TypeobservationalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2015 to 2028Enrolled2,145ConditionsCraniosynostosisArmsCraniosynostosis Network Environmental Survey, 2D/3D Photography, Buccal Swab Cell Sampling, Blood sampling, Skin Biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yann HeuzéUMR5199 PACEA, Bordeaux Archaeological Sciences Cluster of Excellence, Université De Bordeaux.
Kazuhiko KawasakiDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Tobias SchwarzDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, UK.
Jeffrey J SchoenebeckDivision of Genetics and Genomics, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, UK.
Joan T RichtsmeierDepartment of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Funding

Project III: Systems Biology of Bone in Coronal Nonsyndromic CraniosynostosisP01HD078233 · NICHD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI DREW, PATRICK JAMES, JABS, ETHYLIN WANG · 2014 to 2019
$7.0M
Midface and Upper Airway in CraniosynostosisR01DE022988 · NIDCR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JABS, ETHYLIN WANG, RICHTSMEIER, JOAN THERESE · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
PHENOGENETICS OF SKULL AND BRAIN INTEGRATION IN CRANIOSYNOSTOSISR01DE018500 · NIDCR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI RICHTSMEIER, JOAN THERESE · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211554NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD078233NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018500NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zygomatic bone is derived evolutionarily from the orbital series. In most modern mammals the zygomatic bone forms a large part of the face and usually serves as a bridge that connects the facial skeleton to the neurocranium. Our aim is to provide information on the contribution of the zygomatic bone to variation in midfacial protrusion using three samples; humans, domesticated dogs, and monkeys. In each case, variation in midface protrusion is a heritable trait produced by one of three classes of transmission: localized dysmorphology associated with single gene dysfunction, selective breeding, or long-term evolution from a common ancestor. We hypothesize that the shape of the zygomatic bone reflects its role in stabilizing the connection between facial skeleton and neurocranium and consequently, changes in facial protrusion are more strongly reflected by the maxilla and premaxilla. Our geometric morphometric analyses support our hypothesis suggesting that the shape of the zygomatic bone has less to do with facial protrusion. By morphometrically dissecting the zygomatic bone we have determined a degree of modularity among parts of the midfacial skeleton suggesting that these components have the ability to vary independently and thus can evolve differentially. From these purely morphometric data, we propose that the neural crest cells that are fated to contribute to the zygomatic bone experience developmental cues that distinguish them from the maxilla and premaxilla. The spatiotemporal and molecular identity of the cues that impart zygoma progenitors with their identity remains an open question that will require alternative data sets. Anat Rec, 299:1616-1630, 2016. © 2016 The Authors The Anatomical Record Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDogsFaceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaxillaZygomadomesticated dogsFGFR-related craniosynostosis syndromesmidfacial hypoplasiamidfacial retrusionNew World monkeysOld World monkeysprognathism

Identifiers

PMID27870340
PMCPMC5111587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.