Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27870086›Full record

ArticleThe Hastings Center report2016

Health Care for NFL Players: Upholding Physician Standards and Enhancing the Doctor-Patient Relationship.

Laurent Duvernay-Tardif

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Hastings Center report, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A Response to Commentaries.The Hastings Center report · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laurent Duvernay-Tardif

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning my third year with the Kansas City Chiefs and being also a medical student at McGill University, I was at first a little reluctant to comment on Glenn Cohen et al.'s critique of the National Football League's structure involving player health and team doctors, but the opportunity to provide a perspective as both a football player and a medical student was too much to forgo. Because of my athletic and academic background, I am often asked what I think about injuries in professional sports and about the role of sports medicine physicians, and Cohen et al.'s article demands a thoughtful reaction. I want to suggest that the fundamental principles concerning the medical profession and the doctor-patient relationship provide additional arguments for some of the solutions that Cohen et al. discuss. The professional self-regulation that the proposed medical committee could provide and the reliance on a doctor who was not hired by the player's employer-the club-for a second opinion are both good ways to minimize conflicts of interest.

Indexed as

Physician's RoleTrustConflict of InterestFootballHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansProfessional PracticeReturn to SportSports MedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27870086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.