ArticleNature2017
Synthetic recording and in situ readout of lineage information in single cells.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 236 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
236 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detectrons convert transient RNA sequences into stable DNA barcodes for high-throughput analysis of RNA-dependent processes.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Reconstructing signaling histories of single cells via perturbation screens and transfer learning.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal lineage tracing reveals the dynamic spatial architecture of tumor growth and metastasis.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Multichannel genomic recording of biological information with ENGRAM.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Bonsai reconstructs tree representations for distortion-free visualization and exploration of high-dimensional data.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genomic repeats for single-cell molecular recording.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SPACE-seq integrates spatial transcriptomics and lineage tracing in native tissues.Cell stem cell · 2026Article
- BASELINE: a CRISPR base editing platform for mammalian-scale single-cell lineage tracing.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Synthetic developmental engineering of human liver organogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Lineage tracing from cellular heritage to disease destiny.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- LAML-Pro: joint maximum likelihood inference of cell genotypes and cell lineage trees.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Bayesian inference of tissue-migration histories in metastatic cancer from cell-lineage tracing data.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Tree reconstruction guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 lineage tracing data using Neighbor-Joining.Genome research · 2026Article
- Using CRISPR barcoding as a molecular clock to capture dynamic processes at single-cell resolution.Genome research · 2026Article
- Article
- LAML-Pro: Joint Maximum Likelihood Inference of Cell Genotypes and Cell Lineage Trees.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- VINE: Variational inference for scalable Bayesian reconstruction of species and cell-lineage phylogenies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genetic recording and in situ readout of single-cell signaling memory.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Regenerative base editing enables deep lineage recording.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SpaceBar enables single-cell-resolution clone tracing with imaging-based spatial transcriptomics.Nature methods · 2026Article
176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstructing the lineage relationships and dynamic event histories of individual cells within their native spatial context is a long-standing challenge in biology. Many biological processes of interest occur in optically opaque or physically inaccessible contexts, necessitating approaches other than direct imaging. Here we describe a synthetic system that enables cells to record lineage information and event histories in the genome in a format that can be subsequently read out of single cells in situ. This system, termed memory by engineered mutagenesis with optical in situ readout (MEMOIR), is based on a set of barcoded recording elements termed scratchpads. The state of a given scratchpad can be irreversibly altered by CRISPR/Cas9-based targeted mutagenesis, and later read out in single cells through multiplexed single-molecule RNA fluorescence hybridization (smFISH). Using MEMOIR as a proof of principle, we engineered mouse embryonic stem cells to contain multiple scratchpads and other recording components. In these cells, scratchpads were altered in a progressive and stochastic fashion as the cells proliferated. Analysis of the final states of scratchpads in single cells in situ enabled reconstruction of lineage information from cell colonies. Combining analysis of endogenous gene expression with lineage reconstruction in the same cells further allowed inference of the dynamic rates at which embryonic stem cells switch between two gene expression states. Finally, using simulations, we show how parallel MEMOIR systems operating in the same cell could enable recording and readout of dynamic cellular event histories. MEMOIR thus provides a versatile platform for information recording and in situ, single-cell readout across diverse biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.