Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27869758›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

The Impact of Rurality and Disadvantage on the Diagnostic Interval for Breast Cancer in a Large Population-Based Study of 3202 Women in Queensland, Australia.

Philippa H Youl, Joanne F Aitken, Gavin Turrell, Suzanne K Chambers, Jeffrey Dunn, Christopher Pyke, Peter D Baade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Use, Facility Mammography Volume, and Timely Follow-Up After Abnormal Screening Mammograms in Appalachia, United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors Associated with Diagnostic Delays among Tunisian Breast Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Geographical Variation in Breast Cancer Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philippa H YoulCancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia. pipyoul@cancerqld.org.au.
Joanne F AitkenCancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia. joanneaitken@cancerqld.org.au.
Gavin TurrellInstitute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC 3115, Australia. Gavin.Turrell@acu.edu.au.
Suzanne K ChambersCancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia. suzanne.chambers@griffith.edu.au.
Jeffrey DunnCancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia. jeffdunn@cancerqld.org.au.
Christopher PykeMater Medical Centre, 293 Vulture Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia. c_pyke@mc.mater.org.au.
Peter D BaadeCancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia. peterbaade@cancerqld.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delays in diagnosing breast cancer (BC) can lead to poorer outcomes. We investigated factors related to the diagnostic interval in a population-based cohort of 3202 women diagnosed with BC in Queensland, Australia. Interviews ascertained method of detection and dates of medical/procedural appointments, and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Time intervals were calculated from self-recognition of symptoms (symptom-detected) or mammogram (screen-detected) to diagnosis (diagnostic interval (DI)). The cohort included 1560 women with symptom-detected and 1642 with screen-detected BC. Symptom-detected women had higher odds of DI of >60 days if they were Indigenous (OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 1.40, 6.98); lived in outer regional (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.09, 2.06) or remote locations (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.39, 4.38); or presented with a "non-lump" symptom (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.43, 2.36). For screen-detected BC, women who were Indigenous (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.03, 5.80); lived in remote locations (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.24, 4.44); or disadvantaged areas (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.17, 2.43) and attended a public screening facility (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.40, 3.17) had higher odds of DI > 30 days. Our study indicates a disadvantage in terms of DI for rural, disadvantaged and Indigenous women. Difficulties in accessing primary care and diagnostic services are evident. There is a need to identify and implement an efficient and effective model of care to minimize avoidable longer diagnostic intervals.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMammographyMiddle AgedOdds RatioQueenslandRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsTime Factorsbreast cancerdelaydiagnosishealth systeminequalitiesrurality

Identifiers

PMID27869758
PMCPMC5129366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.