Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27869487›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2017

The incidence of incisional hernias following ileostomy reversal in colorectal cancer patients treated with anterior resection.

Balazs Fazekas, Bence Fazekas, J Hendricks, N Smart, T Arulampalam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Prophylaxis of parastomal, perineal and incisional hernias in colorectal surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Balazs FazekasColorectal Department, Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust , Colchester , UK.
Bence FazekasGRN Klinik Weinheim , Weinheim , Germany.
J HendricksColorectal Department, Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust , Colchester , UK.
N SmartRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital , Exeter , UK.
T ArulampalamColorectal Department, Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust , Colchester , UK.
Colchester Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to identify the rate of incisional hernia formation following ileostomy reversal in patients who underwent anterior resection for colorectal cancer. In addition, we aimed to ascertain risk factors for the development of reversal-site incisional hernias and to record the characteristics of the resultant hernias. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a prospectively compiled database of colorectal cancer patients who were treated with anterior resection, we identified individuals who had undergone both ileostomy formation and subsequent reversal of their ileostomies from January 2005 to December 2014. Medical records were reviewed to record descriptive patient data about risk factors for hernia formation, operative details and any subsequent operations. Computed tomography reports were reviewed to identify the number, site and characteristics of incisional hernias. RESULTS A total of 121 patients were included in this study; 14.9% (n = 18) developed an incisional hernia at the ileostomy reversal site; 17.4% (n = 21) at a non-ileostomy site and 6.6% (n = 8) developed both. The reversal-site hernias were smaller both in width and length compared with the non-ileostomy-site hernias. Risk factors for the development of reversal-site incisional hernias were higher body mass index (BMI), lower age, open surgery, longer reversal time and a history of previous hernias. We did not detect a difference in the size of the incisional hernias that developed in patients with these specific risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Incisional hernias are a significant complication of ileostomy reversal. Further evaluation of the use of prophylactic mesh to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias may be worthwhile.

Indexed as

IleostomyAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHernia, AbdominalHumansIncidenceIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedComputed TomographyIleostomyIncidenceIncisional HerniaRectal Cancer

Identifiers

PMID27869487
PMCPMC5449678
OpenAlexW2550008355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.