Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27869044›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2017

Relationship between the home environment and fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged 6-12 years: a systematic review.

Jia Xin Ong, Shahid Ullah, Anthea Magarey, Jacqueline Miller, Eva Leslie

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Factors associated with water consumption among children: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Adapting family-based treatment for paediatric obesity: A randomized controlled pilot trial.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jia Xin Ong1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine,Nursing and Health Sciences,Flinders University,GPO Box 2100 Adelaide,Bedford Park,SA 5042,Australia.
Shahid Ullah2Flinders Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Medicine,Flinders University,Bedford Park,SA,Australia.
Anthea Magarey1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine,Nursing and Health Sciences,Flinders University,GPO Box 2100 Adelaide,Bedford Park,SA 5042,Australia.
Jacqueline Miller1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine,Nursing and Health Sciences,Flinders University,GPO Box 2100 Adelaide,Bedford Park,SA 5042,Australia.
Eva Leslie1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics,School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine,Nursing and Health Sciences,Flinders University,GPO Box 2100 Adelaide,Bedford Park,SA 5042,Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs numerous factors in the home environment have been related to children's fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption as a component of a healthy diet, the purpose of the present systematic review was to examine these factors specifically for children aged 6-12 years.

designRelevant observational studies published in English between January 2007 and December 2015 were obtained through electronic database searches. Studies were included if the researchers reported on a potentially modifiable measure of the home physical, political and sociocultural environment related to child F&V consumption.

resultsOf the thirty-three articles reviewed, overall methodological quality was poor with twenty studies rated as weak, mainly due to cross-sectional design (majority of studies), selection bias, convenience sampling and voluntary participation. Half of the studies had strong-moderate ratings for using valid and/or reliable tools while for the other half, psychometric properties were either not reported or weak. The most consistent evidence for children's combined F&V consumption was found for availability and accessibility of F&V, parental role modelling of F&V and maternal intake of F&V.

conclusionsA vast array of home environment components and their influence on children's consumption of fruits and/or vegetables have been studied in recent years. Specific components of the home environment may have more influence than others, but more compelling evidence is needed to draw strong conclusions. Recommendations are made for future studies to be based upon conceptual/theoretical models to provide consistency in defining the home environment and investigation of potential moderators, such as personal or contextual factors.

Indexed as

EnvironmentFruitVegetablesChildCross-Sectional StudiesEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicFood availabilityHome environmentRole modelling

Identifiers

PMID27869044
PMCPMC10261585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.