Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27868327›Full record

Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

Communication and patient participation influencing patient recall of treatment discussions.

Claude Richard, Emma Glaser, Marie-Thérèse Lussier

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Chatbots for breast cancer education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Socio-economic differences in patient participation behaviours in doctor-patient interactions-A systematic mapping review of the literature.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fostering Physician-Patient Partnerships: The Importance of Embracing the Ontological and Epistemological Understandings of Knowledge.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  14. DischargeSim: A Simulation Benchmark for Educational Doctor-Patient Communication at Discharge.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claude RichardPrimary Care Research Team, Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux de Laval, Laval, QC, Canada.
Emma GlaserPrimary Care Research Team, Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux de Laval, Laval, QC, Canada.
Marie-Thérèse LussierPrimary Care Research Team, Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux de Laval, Laval, QC, Canada.
Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPatient recall of treatment information is a key variable towards chronic disease (CD) management. It is unclear what communication and patient participation characteristics predict recall.

objectivesTo assess what aspects of doctor-patient communication predict patient recall of medication information. To describe lifestyle treatment recall, in CD primary care patients.

designObservational study within a RCT. SETTING &

participantsCommunity-based primary care (PC) practices. Family physicians (n=18): practicing >5 years, with a CD patient caseload. Patients (n=159): >40 years old, English speaking, computer literate, off-target hypertension, type II diabetes and/or dyslipidaemia. MAIN VARIABLES: Patient characteristics: age, education, number of CDs. Information characteristics: length of encounter, medication status, medication class. Communication variables: socio-emotional utterances, physician dominance and communication control scores and PACE (ask, check and express) utterances, measured by RIAS. Number of medication themes, dialogue and initiative measured by MEDICODE.

main outcome measuresRecall of CD, lifestyle treatment and medication information.

resultsFrequency of lifestyle discussions varied by topic. Patients recalled 43% (alcohol), 52% (diet) to 70% (exercise) of discussions. Two and a half of six possible medication themes were broached per medication discussion. Less than one was recalled. Discussing more themes, greater dialogue and patient initiative were significant predictors of improved medication information recall. DISCUSSION: Critical treatment information is infrequently exchanged. Active patient engagement and explicit conversations about medications are associated with improved treatment information recall in off-target CD patients followed in PC.

conclusionProviders cannot take for granted that long-term off-target CD patients recall information. They need to encourage patient participation to improve recall of treatment information.

Indexed as

CommunicationMedication AdherenceMental RecallPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedChronic DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPrimary Health Carechronic diseaseinterpersonal communicationlifestyle discussionsmedication discussionspatient participationprimary health carerecall

Identifiers

PMID27868327
PMCPMC5513012
OpenAlexW2554398431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.