ArticleBrain tumor research and treatment2016
Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Angiomatous Meningiomas.
Article in Brain tumor research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- FOXC1 expression and radiological predictors of peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Recurrent Angiomatous Meningioma in a Young Adult: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Preoperative MRI-based radiomic nomogram for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumor from angiomatous meningioma: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A Meningioma With Extensive Peritumoral Edema Mimicking Metastatic Brain Tumor: A Case Report.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023Article
- Differentiation between Angiomatous Meningioma and Solitary Fibrous Tumors.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2022Article
- Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Differentially Diagnosing Angiomatous Meningiomas and Solitary Fibrous Tumors/Hemangiopericytomas.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiomatous meningioma is a rare histological subtype of meningioma. Therefore, this specific medical condition is rarely reviewed in the literature. In the present work, we report the clinical and radiological features with postoperative outcomes of angiomatous meningioma.
methodsThis retrospective study included the patients who were pathologically diagnosed with angiomatous meningioma after surgical resection between February 2010 and September 2015 in our institute. We analyzed the clinical data, radiological manifestation, treatment and prognosis of all patients.
resultsThe 15 patients (5 males and 10 females) were diagnosed with angiomatous meningioma during the study period. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 63 years (range: 40 to 80 years). According to Simpson classification, 7, 5, and 3 patients achieved Simpson grade I, II, and IV resection, respectively. In the follow-up period, recurrence was noted in one patient. Ten out of the 15 patients showed homogeneous enhancement. Two patients demonstrated cystic changes. There was no occurrence of calcification or hemorrhage in our patients. Characteristically, 14 out of 15 patients showed signal voids of vessels. Significant peritumoral edema was observed in the majority of tumors (67%).
conclusionAngiomatous meningiomas are rare benign meningioma. Brain images of angiomatous meningioma usually demonstrate signal void signs and peritumoral edema. In the present study, angiomatous meningiomas showed good prognosis after surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.