Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867862›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2016

Intermittent neural monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in surgery for recurrent goiter.

Beata Wojtczak, Marcin Barczyński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Redo Thyroidectomy: Updated Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complication Risk in Secondary Thyroid Surgery.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beata Wojtczak1st Department and Clinic of General, Gastroenterological and Endocrine Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Marcin BarczyńskiDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, 3rd Chair of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reoperative thyroid surgery is still challenging even for skilled surgeons, and is associated with a higher incidence of complications, such as hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy. Displacement of the RLN, scar tissue from previous neck surgery and difficulty in maintaining good hemostasis are risk factors in reoperations. The prevalence of RLN injury in reoperative thyroid surgery ranges as high as 12.5% for transient injury and up to 3.8% for permanent injury. Bilateral paresis can also occur during reoperations, and is a dangerous complication influencing the quality of life, sometimes requiring tracheostomy. RLN identification is the gold standard during thyroidectomy, and the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) can be a valuable adjunct to visual identification. This technique can be used to identify the RLN and the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN), both of which are standardized procedures. The aim of this review was to evaluate the use of intermittent neural monitoring of the RLN in surgery for recurrent goiter, and to assess the prevalence of RLN injury while using IONM reported in the current literature.

Indexed as

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM)laryngeal recurrent nerverecurrent goiter

Identifiers

PMID27867862
PMCPMC5106386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.