Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867845›Full record

ReviewTranslational pediatrics2016

Current management of non-palpable testes: a literature review and clinical results.

Ximena Sepúlveda, Pedro-José López Egaña

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analgesic use in pregnancy and male reproductive development.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2017
    Review
  14. A comparative study between two techniques of laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testis.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ximena SepúlvedaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Valparaíso, Dr. Gustavo Fricke Hospital, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Pedro-José López EgañaPediatric Urology Service, Dr. Exequiel González Cortés Hospital, Santiago, Chile;; Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile;; Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
Clínica Alemana · CLHospital Dr. Gustavo Fricke · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptorchidism is a common pathology that occurs in 3% in full term newborns, and it decreases to 0.8-1.2% at 1 year of age. Nearly a 20% of undescended testes are non-palpable. Various surgical treatments have been described, but its management is still controversial. A literature review was made of non-palpable testes, analysing diagnostic tools, treatment and its results. Additionally we reviewed non-palpable testes cases treated in our centre in the last 20 years. Different techniques are described for the management of non-palpable testes; with or without section of the spermatic vessels and/or in 1 or 2 stages. Nowadays, literature supports the laparoscopic management in two stages. In our experience, we have better results in two-stage Fowler-Stephens than one-stage, with lower rates of testicular atrophy. Non-palpable testes are a common pathology in paediatric urology. Analysing the literature and our experience we recommend a two-stage surgery for intra-abdominal testes, which has demonstrated good results and lower percentage of atrophic testis.

Indexed as

laparoscopicmanagementpaediatricTestis

Identifiers

PMID27867845
PMCPMC5107370
OpenAlexW2552793513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.