Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867420›Full record

ArticleChild development perspectives2016

A Lattice Model of the Development of Reading Comprehension.

Carol McDonald Connor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Predicting Second and Third Graders' Reading Comprehension Gains: Observing Students' and Classmates Talk during Literacy Instruction using COLT.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Examining the Efficacy of Targeted Component Interventions on Language and Literacy for Third and Fourth Graders Who are at Risk of Comprehension Difficulties.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carol McDonald ConnorUniversity of California Irvine.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TIFFANY P HOGAN · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
Child-Instruction Interactions Causal Effects on ReadingR01HD048539 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CAROL MCDONALD · 2005 to 2010
$2.4M
Developing Dynamic Forecasting Intervention Models for Upper Elementary StudentsR21HD062834 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CAROL MCDONALD · 2010 to 2011
$356k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048539NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD062834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, I present a developmental model of how children learn to comprehend what they read, which builds on current models of reading comprehension and integrates findings from instructional research and evidence-based models of development in early and middle childhood. The lattice model holds that children's developing reading comprehension is a function of the interacting, reciprocal, and bootstrapping effects of developing text-specific, linguistic, and social-cognitive processes, which interact with instruction as child-characteristic-by-instruction (CXI) interaction effects. The processes develop over time and in the context of classroom, home, peer, community, and other influences to affect children's development of proficient reading comprehension. I first describe models of reading comprehension. I then review the basic processes in the model, the role of instruction, and CXI interactions in the context of the lattice model. I then discuss implications for instruction and research.

Indexed as

CognitionInstructionLanguageLiteracyReadingSelf-regulation

Identifiers

PMID27867420
PMCPMC5110216
OpenAlexW2530765712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.