Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867392›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

The

Igor Fesenko, Anna Seredina, Georgij Arapidi, Vasily Ptushenko, Anatoly Urban, Ivan Butenko, Sergey Kovalchuk, Konstantin Babalyan, Andrey Knyazev, Regina Khazigaleeva and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pilot satellitome analysis of the model plant,Comparative cytogenetics · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Igor FesenkoLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Anna SeredinaLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Georgij ArapidiLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Vasily PtushenkoDepartment of Bioenergetics, Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscow, Russia; Department of Biocatalysis, Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia.
Anatoly UrbanLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Ivan ButenkoLaboratory of the Proteomic Analysis, Research Institute for Physico-Chemical Medicine Moscow, Russia.
Sergey KovalchukLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin BabalyanLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Andrey KnyazevLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Regina KhazigaleevaLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Elena PushkovaLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Nikolai AnikanovLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Vadim IvanovLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia.
Vadim M GovorunLaboratory of Proteomics, Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscow, Russia; Laboratory of the Proteomic Analysis, Research Institute for Physico-Chemical MedicineMoscow, Russia.
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RUPhysico-Technical Institute · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant protoplasts are widely used for genetic manipulation and functional studies in transient expression systems. However, little is known about the molecular pathways involved in a cell response to the combined stress factors resulted from protoplast generation. Plants often face more than one type of stress at a time, and how plants respond to combined stress factors is therefore of great interest. Here, we used protoplasts of the moss

Indexed as

chloroplast proteomelabel-free quantificationmoss Physcomitrella patensMRM-MSstress conditionsSWATH-MS

Identifiers

PMID27867392
PMCPMC5095126
OpenAlexW2547242455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.