ArticleCurrent urology2016
Caffeine as a Probable Factor for Increased Risk of OAB Development in Elderly People.
Article in Current urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Persistent Storage Symptoms and Overactive Bladder in Men Diagnosed with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Narrative Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Effect of Fluid and Caffeine Management on Quality of Life in Older Women with Overactive Bladder in Rural Korea: A Pilot Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Fluid and Caffeine Modifications on Symptoms in Adults With Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review.International neurourology journal · 2023Article
- Quality of life and the prevalence of urinary incontinence after surgical treatment for gynecologic cancer: a questionnaire survey.BMC women's health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to compare overactive bladder (OAB) prevalence among people greater than 60 years of age who intake various doses of caffeine, as well as those who abstain from caffeine. PATIENTS AND
methodsA randomized observational study was carried out in Vladivostok Gerontological Hospital. A total of 1,098 retired people greater than 60 years of age (659 women and 439 men, average age 67.1 years) took part in the study. They were admitted to the in-patient department with the purpose of annual physical examination performed in accordance with the order of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation. People over age 60, who at the moment of examination were in satisfactory health condition, were included into the study. People in which OAB had been detected or who used to take antimuscarinic were excluded from the study. Assessment tools for examining the patients' lower urinary tract condition were as follows: OAB-q SF, urination diaries, and uroflowmetry.
resultsIn the course of the experiment conducted, we found that 1/3 of people, both men and women greater than 60 years of age, who did not previously seek medical advice due to urination troubles, had symptoms of detrusor overactivity. These symptoms were moderate and did not bother patients too much in most cases (63.4%). It was also found that most patients consumed no more than 300mg caffeine with beverages per day, with 30% and 10% of patients suffering from OAB or severe detrusor overactivity, respectively. At the same time, almost 50% of patients taking more than 300 mg of caffeine per day suffer from OAB.
conclusion48.1% of people over 60 years of age suffering from overactive detrusor symptoms consume greater than 300 mg caffeine daily, which is significantly higher than that of their peers who do not intake excessive amounts of caffeine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.