Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867262›Full record

ArticleCritical public health2016

Colonial legacy and the experience of First Nations women in cervical cancer screening: a Canadian multi-community study.

Pamela Wakewich, Brianne Wood, Crystal Davey, Ashlie Laframboise, Ingeborg Zehbe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Systematic Literature Review of Cancer Communication with Indigenous Populations in Canada and the United States.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Réflexions sur les soins de santé aux patients autochtones: Instaurer la confiance.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  18. Reflections on Indigenous health care: Building trust.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  19. Improving preventive screening with Indigenous peoples.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  20. Améliorer le dépistage chez les patients autochtones.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pamela WakewichSociology and Women's Studies, Centre for Rural and Northern Health, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada; Human Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM), Thunder Bay, Canada.
Brianne WoodAnishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS), Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute (TBRRI), Thunder Bay, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Crystal DaveyAnishnawbe Mushkiki Aboriginal Health Access Centre, Thunder Bay, Canada.
Ashlie LaframboiseRed Rock Indian Band, Lake Helen Reserve, Canada.
Ingeborg ZehbeAnishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS), Thunder Bay Regional Research Institute (TBRRI), Thunder Bay, Canada; Probe Development and Biomarker Exploration, TBRRI, Thunder Bay, Canada; Clinical Sciences, NOSM, Thunder Bay, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 119344-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular Papanicolaou (Pap) screening has dramatically reduced cervical cancer incidence in Canada since the 1950s. However, Indigenous women's rates of cervical cancer remain disproportionately high, a factor which is not acknowledged in national media or in educational materials reporting Canada's new cervical cancer screening guidelines. Here, we present findings from a cervical cancer screening initiative in Northwestern Ontario. Based on participatory action research, we worked with 10 First Nations communities in the Robinson Superior Treaty area to increase awareness of cervical cancer risk, develop culturally sensitive tools for screening and education and test the efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as an alternative to Pap cytology. We conducted 16 interviews with health care professionals and 9 focus groups with 69 women from the communities. A central theme for both health care providers (HCPs) and community members was the colonial legacy and its influence on women's experiences of cervical cancer screening. This was evidenced by a strong sense of body shyness, including shame related to sexuality and sexually transmitted infections, concerns about confidentiality in clinical encounters and distrust or caution around HCPs. Reaffirming women's traditional caregiving and educational roles, enhancing mother and daughter communication, improving cultural sensitivity in health care and education and adoption of HPV self-sampling to increase women's privacy and control of the cervical cancer screening experience were endorsed. We argue that education and screening initiatives must reflect the cultural preferences of Indigenous women, empowering them to take control of their experiences of health and body in cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

cervical cancer screeningcolonial legacyFirst Nations womengender and embodimentparticipatory action research

Identifiers

PMID27867262
PMCPMC5112009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.