Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867216›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of applied ecology2016

Investigating the impacts of field-realistic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide on bumblebee foraging, homing ability and colony growth.

Dara A Stanley, Avery L Russell, Sarah J Morrison, Catherine Rogers, Nigel E Raine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of applied ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Current Insights into Sublethal Effects of Pesticides on Insects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dara A StanleySchool of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham TW20 0EX UK; Botany and Plant Science School of Natural Sciences and Ryan Institute National University of Ireland GalwayIreland.
Avery L RussellGraduate Interdisciplinary Program in Entomology and Insect Science University of Arizona Tucson AZ 85721 USA.
Sarah J MorrisonLunar and Planetary Laboratory University of Arizona Tucson AZ 85721 USA.
Catherine RogersSchool of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham TW20 0EX UK.
Nigel E RaineSchool of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham TW20 0EX UK; School of Environmental Sciences University of Guelph Guelph ON N1G 2W1 Canada.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000178/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to forage and return home is essential to the success of bees as both foragers and pollinators. Pesticide exposure may cause behavioural changes that interfere with these processes, with consequences for colony persistence and delivery of pollination services.We investigated the impact of chronic exposure (5-43 days) to field-realistic levels of a neonicotinoid insecticide (2·4 ppb thiamethoxam) on foraging ability, homing success and colony size using radio frequency identification (RFID) technology in free-flying bumblebee colonies.Individual foragers from pesticide-exposed colonies carried out longer foraging bouts than untreated controls (68 vs. 55 min). Pesticide-exposed bees also brought back pollen less frequently than controls indicating reduced foraging performance.A higher proportion of bees from pesticide-exposed colonies returned when released 1 km from their nests; this is potentially related to increased orientation experience during longer foraging bouts. We measured no impact of pesticide exposure on homing ability for bees released from 2 km, or when data were analysed overall.Despite a trend for control colonies to produce more new workers earlier, we found no overall impacts of pesticide exposure on whole colony size.

Indexed as

agrochemicalbumble bee Bombus terrestrisflower‐visiting insectsinsecticidenavigationneonicotinoidspesticide exposurepollinationRFID tagging

Identifiers

PMID27867216
PMCPMC5103171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.