Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867204›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2017

A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial.

R J Beeken, B Leurent, V Vickerstaff, R Wilson, H Croker, S Morris, R Z Omar, I Nazareth, J Wardle

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of inequalities in the uptake of, adherence to, and effectiveness of behavioral weight management interventions in adults.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Mechanisms of Action in a Behavioral Weight-Management Program: Latent Growth Curve Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Understanding Primary Care Dietitians' Experiences and Perspectives on Weight Management Practice Using the COM-B Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J BeekenDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
B LeurentDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
V VickerstaffDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
R WilsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
H CrokerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
S MorrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
R Z OmarDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
I NazarethDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
J WardleDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14133Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UMedical Research Council G0802027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is the 'first port of call' for weight control advice, creating a need for simple, effective interventions that can be delivered without specialist skills. Ten Top Tips (10TT) is a leaflet based on habit-formation theory that could fill this gap. The aim of the current study was to test the hypothesis that 10TT can achieve significantly greater weight loss over 3 months than 'usual care'.

methodsA two-arm, individually randomised, controlled trial in primary care. Adults with obesity were identified from 14 primary care providers across England. Patients were randomised to either 10TT or 'usual care' and followed up at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome was weight loss at 3 months, assessed by a health professional blinded to group allocation. Difference between arms was assessed using a mixed-effect linear model taking into account the health professionals delivering 10TT, and adjusted for baseline weight. Secondary outcomes included body mass index, waist circumference, the number achieving a 5% weight reduction, clinical markers for potential comorbidities, weight loss over 24 months and basic costs.

resultsFive-hundred and thirty-seven participants were randomised to 10TT (n=267) or to 'usual care' (n=270). Data were available for 389 (72%) participants at 3 months and for 312 (58%) at 24 months. Participants receiving 10TT lost significantly more weight over 3 months than those receiving usual care (mean difference =-0.87kg; 95% confidence interval: -1.47 to -0.27; P=0.004). At 24 months, the 10TT group had maintained their weight loss, but the 'usual care' group had lost a similar amount. The basic cost of 10TT was low, that is, around £23 ($32) per participant.

conclusionsThe 10TT leaflet delivered through primary care is effective in the short-term and a low-cost option over the longer term. It is the first habit-based intervention to be used in a health service setting and offers a low-intensity alternative to 'usual care'.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHabitsHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalObesityPamphletsRisk Reduction BehaviorWeight LossWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID27867204
PMCPMC5300101
OpenAlexW2555206522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.