Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867088›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Techniques for blood volume fMRI with VASO: From low-resolution mapping towards sub-millimeter layer-dependent applications.

Laurentius Huber, Dimo Ivanov, Daniel A Handwerker, Sean Marrett, Maria Guidi, Kâmil Uludağ, Peter A Bandettini, Benedikt A Poser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Differential Laminar Activation Dissociates Encoding and Retrieval in the Human Medial and Lateral Entorhinal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurentius HuberSection on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: Laurentius.Huber@nih.gov.
Dimo IvanovMaastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciencve, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daniel A HandwerkerSection on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sean MarrettFMRIF, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maria GuidiMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Kâmil UludağMaastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciencve, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter A BandettiniSection on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA; FMRIF, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Benedikt A PoserMaastricht Brain Imaging Centre, Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciencve, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZIAMH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZ01MH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER A · 2002 to 2008
$5.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002783Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative cerebral blood volume (CBV) fMRI has the potential to overcome several specific limitations of BOLD fMRI. It provides direct physiological interpretability and promises superior localization specificity in applications of sub-millimeter resolution fMRI applications at ultra-high magnetic fields (7T and higher). Non-invasive CBV fMRI using VASO (vascular space occupancy), however, is inherently limited with respect to its data acquisition efficiency, restricting its imaging coverage and achievable spatial and temporal resolution. This limitation may be reduced with recent advanced acceleration and reconstruction strategies that allow two-dimensional acceleration, such as in simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) 2D-EPI or 3D-EPI in combination with CAIPIRINHA field-of-view shifting. In this study, we sought to determine the functional sensitivity and specificity of these readout strategies with VASO over a broad range of spatial resolutions; spanning from low spatial resolution (3mm) whole-cortex to sub-millimeter (0.75mm) slab-of-cortex (for cortical layer-dependent applications). In the thermal-noise-dominated regime of sub-millimeter resolutions, 3D-EPI-VASO provides higher temporal stability and sensitivity to detect changes in CBV compared to 2D-EPI-VASO. In this regime, 3D-EPI-VASO unveils task activation located in the cortical laminae with little contamination from surface veins, in contrast to the cortical surface weighting of GE-BOLD fMRI. In the physiological-noise-dominated regime of lower resolutions, however, 2D-SMS-VASO shows superior performance compared to 3D-EPI-VASO. Due to its superior sensitivity at a layer-dependent level, 3D-EPI VASO promises to play an important role in future neuroscientific applications of layer-dependent fMRI.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBlood VolumeBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Aged3D-EPI7 T MRICerebral blood volumeLayer-dependent fMRISimultaneous multi-sliceSS-SI VASOVascular space occupancy

Identifiers

PMID27867088
PMCPMC5436958
OpenAlexW2551237976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.