Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27867057›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2017

Understanding protein domain-swapping using structure-based models of protein folding.

Nahren Manuel Mascarenhas, Shachi Gosavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Regulation of PBP2x Surface Localization byPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Tangled Tail of Mechanically Interlocked Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Trichocystatin-2 fromFrontiers in parasitology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conserved proline residues prevent dimerization and aggregation in the β-lactamase BlaC.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Protein Assembly by Design.Chemical reviews · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nahren Manuel MascarenhasSimons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India.
Shachi GosaviSimons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India. Electronic address: shachi@ncbs.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In domain-swapping, two or more identical protein monomers exchange structural elements and fold into dimers or multimers whose units are structurally similar to the original monomer. Domain-swapping is of biotechnological interest because inhibiting domain-swapping can reduce disease-causing fibrillar protein aggregation. To achieve such inhibition, it is important to understand both the energetics that stabilize the domain-swapped structure and the protein dynamics that enable the swapping. Structure-based models (SBMs) encode the folded structure of the protein in their potential energy functions. SBMs have been successfully used to understand diverse aspects of monomer folding. Symmetrized SBMs model interactions between two identical protein chains using only intra-monomer interactions. Molecular dynamics simulations of such symmetrized SBMs have been used to correctly predict the domain-swapped structure and to understand the mechanism of domain-swapping. Here, we review such models and illustrate that monomer topology determines key aspects of domain-swapping. However, in some proteins, specifics of local energetic interactions modulate domain-swapping and these need to be added to the symmetrized SBMs. We then summarize some general principles of the mechanism of domain-swapping that emerge from the symmetrized SBM simulations. Finally, using our own results, we explore how symmetrized SBMs could be used to design domain-swapping in proteins.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingProtein DomainsProteinsProteinsMechanism of domain swappingMolecular dynamics simulationsProtein topologySymmetrized structure-based models

Identifiers

PMID27867057
PMCPMC7127520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.