Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27866478›Full record

ReviewParasitology2018

Evaluating drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis: the challenges.

S Hendrickx, P J Guerin, G Caljon, S L Croft, L Maes

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antileishmanial Activities of Methanol Extract and Solvent Fraction ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. In vitro Anti-Leishmanial Activities of Methanol Extract ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Polyamine Metabolism inMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S HendrickxLaboratory for Microbiology,Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH),University of Antwerp,Antwerp,Belgium.
P J GuerinNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health,University of Oxford,Oxford,UK.
G CaljonLaboratory for Microbiology,Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH),University of Antwerp,Antwerp,Belgium.
S L CroftLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine,Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases,London,UK.
L MaesLaboratory for Microbiology,Parasitology and Hygiene (LMPH),University of Antwerp,Antwerp,Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEInfectious Diseases Data Observatory · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades antimonials were the drugs of choice for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but the recent emergence of resistance has made them redundant as first-line therapy in the endemic VL region in the Indian subcontinent. The application of other drugs has been limited due to adverse effects, perceived high cost, need for parenteral administration and increasing rate of treatment failures. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmB) and miltefosine (MIL) have been positioned as the effective first-line treatments; however, the number of monotherapy MIL-failures has increased after a decade of use. Since no validated molecular resistance markers are yet available, monitoring and surveillance of changes in drug sensitivity and resistance still depends on standard phenotypic in vitro promastigote or amastigote susceptibility assays. Clinical isolates displaying defined MIL- or AmB-resistance are still fairly scarce and fundamental and applied research on resistance mechanisms and dynamics remains largely dependent on laboratory-generated drug resistant strains. This review addresses the various challenges associated with drug susceptibility and -resistance monitoring in VL, with particular emphasis on the choice of strains, susceptibility model selection and standardization of procedures with specific read-out parameters and well-defined threshold criteria. The latter are essential to support surveillance systems and safeguard the limited number of currently available antileishmanial drugs.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MultipleAmphotericin BAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsHumansLeishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, VisceralMeglumine AntimoniateParasitic Sensitivity TestsPhosphorylcholinePsychodidaeRecurrenceAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal Agentsliposomal amphotericin BMeglumine AntimoniatemiltefosinePhosphorylcholineassay proceduresdrug susceptibilityharmonizationVisceral leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID27866478
PMCPMC5989324
OpenAlexW2555473081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.