ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017
Comparative of Quercus spp. and Salix spp. for phytoremediation of Pb/Zn mine tailings.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide identification, expression and functional analysis of glutathioneFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Lead and copper removal from sterile dumps by phytoremediation with Robinia pseudoacacia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Lead accumulation and biochemical responses inRSC advances · 2023Article
- Germplasm Resources of Oaks (Biology · 2022Review
- Nitrogen and sulfur fertilizers promote the absorption of lead and cadmium withFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Inoculation With Indigenous Rhizosphere Microbes Enhances Aboveground Accumulation of Lead inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Indigenous Bacteria Have High Potential for PromotingFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- A critical review on environmental implications, recycling strategies, and ecological remediation for mine tailings.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Phytoextraction of potentially toxic elements by six tree species growing on hazardous mining sludge.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using tree seedlings for the phytoremediation of lead/zinc (Pb/Zn) mine tailings. Seedlings of three Quercus spp. (Q. shumardii, Q. phellos, and Q. virginiana) and rooted cuttings of two Salix spp. (S. matsudana and S. integra) were transplanted into pots containing 50 and 100 % Pb/Zn mine tailings to evaluate their tolerance of heavy metals. The five species showed different tolerance levels to the Pb/Zn tailings treatments. Q. virginiana was highly tolerant to heavy metals and grew normally in the Pb/Zn tailings. The root systems showed marked differences between the Quercus spp. and Salix spp., indicating that different mechanisms operated to confer tolerance of heavy metals. The maximum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry value of the five species showed no differences among the treatments, except for Q. shumardii. All species showed low metal translocation factors (TFs). However, S. integra had significantly higher TF values for Zn (1.42-2.18) and cadmium (1.03-1.45) than did the other species. In this respect, Q. virginiana showed the highest tolerance and a low TF, implying that it is a candidate for phytostabilization of mine tailings in southern China. S. integra may be useful for phytoextraction of tailings in temperate regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27866363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.