Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27866331›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Photoreceptor degeneration by intravitreal injection of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) in rabbits: a pilot study.

Sarah Rösch, Claudia Werner, Frank Müller, Peter Walter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah RöschDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Claudia WernerDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Frank MüllerInstitute of Complex Systems, Cellular Biophysics, ICS-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany.
Peter WalterDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. pwalter@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8745-6593
RWTH Aachen University · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPilot study on the attempt to induce selective photoreceptor degeneration in the rabbit eye by intravitreal injection of MNU, facing the difficulties of the evaluation of retinal degeneration by different in-vivo and in-vitro methods in such a large eye animal model.

methodsEight pigmented Chinchilla Bastard rabbits were injected intravitreally with MNU (1 × 1mg/kg body weight (BW), 1 × 2mg/kg BW, 3 × 3mg/kg BW, 1 × 4mg/kg BW, 1 × 6mg/kg BW, and 1 × DMSO + PBS as control). One, 2, and 3 weeks after injection, the effects on the rabbit retina were examined in vivo using clinical observation (macroscopic images, funduscopy, weighing of the animals), measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), full-field Electroretinography (ffERG), and spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography (sd-OCT). After 3 weeks follow-up, blood samples were taken to evaluate the general health status of the animals, and immunohistochemistry (IH) was performed on sections obtained from six different regions throughout the whole retina to evaluate MNU effects in more detail.

resultsIt was difficult to observe the effects of MNU on retinal structure by OCT in vivo. Only the temporal quadrant of the retina could be visualized. Therefore, it was indispensible to evaluate the effects of MNU on the retina in vitro by examining six areas of the retina using immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry plays a decisive role to evaluate the effects on retinal cells other than photoreceptors while in H&E staining, namely the cell count of the ONL can be observed. The results obtained in vivo and in vitro in this study mainly follow the results of a previous study in mice. The low doses of MNU (1, 2 mg/kg BW) had no effects on retinal function and morphology, while high doses (4, 6 mg/kg BW) led to retinal changes in combination with significant side-effects (e.g., cataractous changes). Injection of 3 mg/kg BW MNU induced selective photoreceptor degeneration. However, the degree of degeneration varied between different parts of the same retina and between retinae of different animals. In two of three animals, a complete loss of ERG potentials was observed. Negative effects on the contralateral eye or on general welfare of the animal were never observed.

conclusionsIn rabbits, the intravitreal injection of 3 mg/kg BW MNU leads to selective but inhomogeneous photoreceptor degeneration.

Indexed as

ApoptosisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectroretinographyFemaleImmunohistochemistryIntravitreal InjectionsMethylnitrosoureaPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebratePilot ProjectsRabbitsRetinal DegenerationTomography, Optical CoherenceMethylnitrosoureaIntravitreal injectionN-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)RabbitRetinal degeneration

Identifiers

PMID27866331
OpenAlexW2557171996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.