Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27866312›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2017

Transgenic citrus expressing synthesized cecropin B genes in the phloem exhibits decreased susceptibility to Huanglongbing.

Xiuping Zou, Xueyou Jiang, Lanzhen Xu, Tiangang Lei, Aihong Peng, Yongrui He, Lixiao Yao, Shanchun Chen

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Innovative strategies for characterizing and managing huanglongbing in citrus.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An endolysin gene fromHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Highly efficientFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiuping ZouCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China. zouxiuping@cric.cn.
Xueyou JiangCitrus Research Institute, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, People's Republic of China.
Lanzhen XuCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China.
Tiangang LeiCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China.
Aihong PengCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China.
Yongrui HeCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China.
Lixiao YaoCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China.
Shanchun ChenCitrus Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Center for Citrus Variety Improvement, Chongqing, 400712, People's Republic of China. chenshanchun@cric.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouthwest University · CNCitrus Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageExpression of synthesized cecropin B genes in the citrus phloem, where Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus resides, significantly decreased host susceptibility to Huanglongbing. Huanglongbing (HLB), associated with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus bacteria, is the most destructive disease of citrus worldwide. All of the commercial sweet orange cultivars lack resistance to this disease. The cationic lytic peptide cecropin B, isolated from the Chinese tasar moth (Antheraea pernyi), has been shown to effectively eliminate bacteria. In this study, we demonstrated that transgenic citrus (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) expressing the cecropin B gene specifically in the phloem had a decreased susceptibility to HLB. Three plant codon-optimized synthetic cecropin B genes, which were designed to secrete the cecropin B peptide into three specific sites, the extracellular space, the cytoplasm, and the endoplasmic reticulum, were constructed. Under the control of the selected phloem-specific promoter GRP1.8, these constructs were transferred into the citrus genome. All of the cecropin B genes were efficiently expressed in the phloem of transgenic plants. Over more than a year of evaluation, the transgenic lines exhibited reduced disease severity. Bacterial populations in transgenic lines were significantly lower than in the controls. Two lines, in which bacterial populations were significantly lower than in others, showed no visible symptoms. Thus, we demonstrated the potential application of the phloem-specific expression of an antimicrobial peptide gene to protect citrus plants from HLB.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCitrus sinensisDisease ResistanceGene ExpressionHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunohistochemistryInsect ProteinsMothsPhloemPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRhizobiaceaececropin B protein, InsectaInsect ProteinsCecropin BCitrusDisease resistanceGenetic transformationHuanglongbingPhloem-specific promoter

Identifiers

PMID27866312
OpenAlexW2550564165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.