Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27865920›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Temporally correlated fluctuations drive epileptiform dynamics.

Maciej Jedynak, Antonio J Pons, Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo, Marc Goodfellow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maciej JedynakDepartament de Física i Enginyeria Nuclear, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa, Spain; Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: maciej.jedynak@protonmail.com.
Antonio J PonsDepartament de Física i Enginyeria Nuclear, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa, Spain.
Jordi Garcia-OjalvoDepartment of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc GoodfellowCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Centre for Biomedical Modelling and Analysis, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; EPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT105618MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroscopic models of brain networks typically incorporate assumptions regarding the characteristics of afferent noise, which is used to represent input from distal brain regions or ongoing fluctuations in non-modelled parts of the brain. Such inputs are often modelled by Gaussian white noise which has a flat power spectrum. In contrast, macroscopic fluctuations in the brain typically follow a 1/f

Indexed as

Brain WavesModels, NeurologicalCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEpilepsyHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedEpilepsyIctogenesisJansen-Rit modelNeural mass modelsNonlinear dynamicsOrnstein‐Uhlenbeck noiseStochastic effects

Identifiers

PMID27865920
PMCPMC5353705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.