SynthesisJournal of clinical epidemiology2017
A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychometric properties of health-related quality of life instruments used in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Effects on health-related quality of life of interventions affecting survival in critically ill patients: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Developing a Core Outcome Measurement Set for Adult ICU Patients, the CoreMS-ICU-A Protocol.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Identifying the burdens for informal caregivers of tracheostomy-dependent people: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Remote multicomponent rehabilitation compared to standard care for survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge (iRehab): a protocol for a randomised controlled assessor-blind clinical and cost-effectiveness trial.NIHR open research · 2025Article
- Survivorship After Neurocritical Care: A Scoping Review of Outcomes Beyond Physical Status.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Evaluating Mental Health Outcomes in COVID-19 ICU Survivors: A Scoping Review of Measurement Tools.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of quality of life for frail, elderly patients post-ICU discharge: a protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Physical function measures in ICU survivors, where to now? A scoping review.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2024Article
- Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment: a scoping review and modified Delphi method study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Assistants' Perspectives on Using Three Physical Function Measures in the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-Methods Study.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2022Article
- Feasibility of Extracting Meaningful Patient Centered Outcomes From the Electronic Health Record Following Critical Illness in the Elderly.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III.Critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings - Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2021Article
- Muscular weakness and muscle wasting in the critically ill.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2020Review
- Determinants of self-reported unacceptable outcome of intensive care treatment 1 year after discharge.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- A survey of Delphi panelists after core outcome set development revealed positive feedback and methods to facilitate panel member participation.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
- Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017Article
- Core Domains for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study.Critical care medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThere is a growing number of studies evaluating the physical, cognitive, mental health, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes of adults surviving critical illness. However, there is little consensus on the most appropriate instruments to measure these outcomes. To inform the development of such consensus, we conducted a systematic review of the performance characteristics of instruments measuring physical, cognitive, mental health, and HRQOL outcomes in adult intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and The Cochrane Library in March 2015. We also conducted manual searches of reference lists of eligible studies and relevant review articles. Two people independently selected studies, completed data abstraction, and assessed the quality of eligible studies using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) initiative checklist.
resultsWe identified 20 studies which explicitly evaluated measurement properties for 21 different instruments assessing outcomes in ICU survivors. Eleven of the instruments assessed quality of life, with few instruments assessing other domains. Of the nine measurement properties evaluated on the COSMIN checklist, six were assessed in <10% of the evaluations. Overall quality of eligible studies was generally poor to fair based on the COSMIN checklist.
conclusionsAlthough an increasing number of studies measure physical, cognitive, mental health, and HRQOL outcomes in adult ICU survivors, data on the measurement properties of such instruments are sparse and generally of poor to fair quality. Empirical analyses evaluating the performance of instruments in adult ICU survivors are needed to advance research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.