ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesion Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Guideline
- The efficacy and safety of submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Development of a Digital Nomogram.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- [Technical advances in endoscopic resection : Potential, limits and the necessary interdisciplinary dialogue with surgery].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advancements in endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Techniques, outcomes, and perspectives.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Endoscopic therapy versus surgical resection for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a population-based comparative analysis of long-term survival outcomes.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Endoscopic Treatment Techniques for Subepithelial Lesions.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesions Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Comparison between interrupted closure technique and traditional closure technique in endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating gastric subepithelial lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Endoscopic semi-blunt dissection technique is safe and effective for treating gastric submucosal tumors from the muscularis propria.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- A multicentre, prospective cohort study comparing two endoscopic procedures for the treatment of gastric muscularis propria lesions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Submucosal tunneling endoscopic full-thickness resection for management of a rare case of esophageal GI stromal tumor.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Postoperative encapsulated hemoperitoneum in a patient with gastric stromal tumor treated by exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Endoscopic full‑thickness resection with clip‑ and snare‑assisted traction for gastric submucosal tumours in the fundus: A single‑centre case series.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Stomach.Gut and liver · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are effective method for treating gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); however, little is known about the comparison between STER and EFTR. The aim of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of STER and EFTR for treating gastric GIST.
methodsWe retrospectively collected the clinical data about patients with gastric GISTs who received STER or EFTR at our hospital from April 2011 to June 2016. Epidemiological data (gender, age), tumor size, procedure-related parameters, complications, length of stay, cost and follow-up data were compared between STER and EFTR.
resultsA total of 52 patients were enrolled, and 20 of them received STER, while the other 32 cases received EFTR. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, concomitant diseases, tumor size, en bloc resection rate, operation time, complications, pathohistological grade of GIST, hospital stay and cost (P > 0.05). However, patients who received EFTR had a longer suture time and needed more clips to close the gastric-wall defect (STER vs EFTR, 291.5 ± 68.7 vs 380.6 ± 96.9s and 6.0 ± 1.2 vs 7.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.05). No recurrence was noted in the STER and EFTR groups during a mean follow-up of 10.9 and 23.8 months, respectively.
conclusionsThe treatment efficacy between STER and EFTR for treating gastric GISTs was comparable, and a large-scale, randomized study is necessary for a more confirmed conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.