Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2786466›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1989

A comparison of coronary risk factors in groups of trained and untrained adolescents.

M Mácek, D Bell, J Rutenfranz, J Vavra, J Masopust, B Neidhart, K H Schmidt

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M MácekCharles University, Faculty of Paediatrics, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
D Bell
J Rutenfranz
J Vavra
J Masopust
B Neidhart
K H Schmidt
Charles University · CZTU Dortmund University · DEUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifty-five experimental (29 male, 25 female) and 38 control (20 male, 18 female) adolescent subjects participated in this study to investigate the differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors in groups of trained and untrained adolescents. As expected the trained group (both sexes) had higher maximal aerobic power (VO2max) and lower systolic blood pressure at rest. The level of total cholesterol was the same in both groups, but the levels of high-density lipoprotein and its lipoprotein subfractions apolipoprotein (Apo-A) and Apo-A1 were higher, and low-density lipoprotein, Apo-B and triglycerides were significantly lower in the experimental group. The value of risk factors from the family history was the same in both groups, but the behavioural and physical risk factors such as smoking and percentage of body fat were lower in the trained group. It would appear that the group of adolescents, trained for several years in athletics and swimming, had a more beneficial lipoprotein profile and a lower level of behavioural and physical risk factors than the control group. For methodological reasons it remains an open question whether these profile differences are the consequences of self-selection procedures or the effects of training.

Indexed as

Physical ExertionPhysical FitnessAdolescentApolipoproteins AApolipoproteins BBlood PressureCholesterolCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLMaleOxygen ConsumptionApolipoproteins AApolipoproteins BCholesterolLipoproteinsLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID2786466
OpenAlexW2060411359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.