ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1989
A comparison of coronary risk factors in groups of trained and untrained adolescents.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of school-based aerobic exercise on blood pressure in adolescent girls at risk for hypertension.American journal of public health · 1998Trial
- Blood lipids and lipoproteins in child and adolescent athletes.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2002Review
- The effect of aerobic exercise training on the lipid-lipoprotein profile of children and adolescents.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fifty-five experimental (29 male, 25 female) and 38 control (20 male, 18 female) adolescent subjects participated in this study to investigate the differences in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors in groups of trained and untrained adolescents. As expected the trained group (both sexes) had higher maximal aerobic power (VO2max) and lower systolic blood pressure at rest. The level of total cholesterol was the same in both groups, but the levels of high-density lipoprotein and its lipoprotein subfractions apolipoprotein (Apo-A) and Apo-A1 were higher, and low-density lipoprotein, Apo-B and triglycerides were significantly lower in the experimental group. The value of risk factors from the family history was the same in both groups, but the behavioural and physical risk factors such as smoking and percentage of body fat were lower in the trained group. It would appear that the group of adolescents, trained for several years in athletics and swimming, had a more beneficial lipoprotein profile and a lower level of behavioural and physical risk factors than the control group. For methodological reasons it remains an open question whether these profile differences are the consequences of self-selection procedures or the effects of training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.