Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27864178›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2017

Microbial Nursery Production of High-Quality Biological Soil Crust Biomass for Restoration of Degraded Dryland Soils.

Sergio Velasco Ayuso, Ana Giraldo Silva, Corey Nelson, Nichole N Barger, Ferran Garcia-Pichel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Assessing the implementation of crustivoltaics inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio Velasco AyusoSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Ana Giraldo SilvaSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Corey NelsonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Nichole N BargerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Ferran Garcia-PichelSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA ferran@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are slow-growing, phototroph-based microbial assemblages that develop on the topsoils of drylands. Biocrusts help maintain soil fertility and reduce erosion. Because their loss through human activities has negative ecological and environmental health consequences, biocrust restoration is of interest. Active soil inoculation with biocrust microorganisms can be an important tool in this endeavor. We present a culture-independent, two-step process to grow multispecies biocrusts in open greenhouse nursery facilities, based on the inoculation of local soils with local biocrust remnants and incubation under seminatural conditions that maintain the essence of the habitat but lessen its harshness. In each of four U.S. Southwest sites, we tested and deployed combinations of factors that maximized growth (gauged as chlorophyll a content) while minimizing microbial community shifts (assessed by 16S rRNA sequencing and bioinformatics), particularly for crust-forming cyanobacteria. Generally, doubling the frequency of natural wetting events, a 60% reduction in sunlight, and inoculation by slurry were optimal. Nutrient addition effects were site specific. In 4 months, our approach yielded crusts of high inoculum quality reared on local soil exposed to locally matched climates, acclimated to desiccation, and containing communities minimally shifted in composition from local ones. Our inoculum contained abundant crust-forming cyanobacteria and no significant numbers of allochthonous phototrophs, and it was sufficient to treat ca. 6,000 m

Indexed as

BiomassDesert ClimateSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaChlorophyllChlorophyll AConservation of Natural ResourcesNew MexicoRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNATexasUtahChlorophyllChlorophyll ARNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAbiological soil crustscyanobacteriadegraded soilsdrylandserosion controlsoil microbiomesoil restoration

Identifiers

PMID27864178
PMCPMC5244311
OpenAlexW2553221408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.