Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27864051›Full record

ArticleHearing research2017

Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.

Elaine C Thompson, Kali Woodruff Carr, Travis White-Schwoch, Sebastian Otto-Meyer, Nina Kraus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Auditory neurophysiological development in early childhood: A growth curve modeling approach.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cortical Tracking of Speech-in-Noise Develops from Childhood to Adulthood.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elaine C ThompsonAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Kali Woodruff CarrAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Travis White-SchwochAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Sebastian Otto-MeyerAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Nina KrausAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Communication Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Neurobiology & Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Electronic address: nkraus@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

A preschool biomarker for literacyR01HD069414 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUS, NINA · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From bustling classrooms to unruly lunchrooms, school settings are noisy. To learn effectively in the unwelcome company of numerous distractions, children must clearly perceive speech in noise. In older children and adults, speech-in-noise perception is supported by sensory and cognitive processes, but the correlates underlying this critical listening skill in young children (3-5 year olds) remain undetermined. Employing a longitudinal design (two evaluations separated by ∼12 months), we followed a cohort of 59 preschoolers, ages 3.0-4.9, assessing word-in-noise perception, cognitive abilities (intelligence, short-term memory, attention), and neural responses to speech. Results reveal changes in word-in-noise perception parallel changes in processing of the fundamental frequency (F0), an acoustic cue known for playing a role central to speaker identification and auditory scene analysis. Four unique developmental trajectories (speech-in-noise perception groups) confirm this relationship, in that improvements and declines in word-in-noise perception couple with enhancements and diminishments of F0 encoding, respectively. Improvements in word-in-noise perception also pair with gains in attention. Word-in-noise perception does not relate to strength of neural harmonic representation or short-term memory. These findings reinforce previously-reported roles of F0 and attention in hearing speech in noise in older children and adults, and extend this relationship to preschool children.

Indexed as

AttentionIndividualityPerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAge FactorsAudiometry, SpeechAuditory PathwaysChild BehaviorChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolComprehensionEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHumansMaleAuditory developmentAuditory processingcABRElectrophysiologyFFRSpeech-in-noise perception

Identifiers

PMID27864051
PMCPMC5239745
OpenAlexW2554678776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.