Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27863536›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2016

How to support staff deploying on overseas humanitarian work: a qualitative analysis of responder views about the 2014/15 West African Ebola outbreak.

Gideon James Rubin, Sarah Harper, Paolo Diaz Williams, Sanna Öström, Samantha Bredbere, Richard Amlôt, Neil Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mental Health in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Telephone based Interventions for Psychological Problems in Hospital Isolated Patients with COVID-19.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gideon James RubinDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK; gideon.rubin@kcl.ac.uk.
Sarah HarperDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Paolo Diaz WilliamsDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Sanna ÖströmDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Samantha BredbereEmergency Response Department Science and Technology, Health Protection and Medical Directorate, Public Health England, Salisbury, UK.
Richard AmlôtEmergency Response Department Science and Technology, Health Protection and Medical Directorate, Public Health England, Salisbury, UK.
Neil GreenbergDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponding to health crises overseas can be both rewarding and distressing for staff involved.

objectiveWe interviewed UK staff involved in the 2014/15 Ebola response to identify experiences that positively or negatively affected them.

methodWe conducted qualitative telephone interviews with 30 Public Health England (PHE) staff and 21 non-governmental organisation (NGO) staff who had deployed to West Africa.

resultsThe main motivations for deploying were for moral reasons and personal development. Families were largely supportive of deployment, although family tension was apparent. Pre-deployment training was largely viewed positively. Common stressors included dealing with death and suffering as well as concerns about contagion, while uplifting aspects included seeing patients improve and receiving thanks from community members. Communications with home were largely satisfactory, although participants commonly self-censored their communication. Inter-organisational tensions caused stress, particularly for PHE staff hosted by NGOs. After deployment, loss of motivation and being avoided by friends and family were common.

conclusionHighlighting the personal benefits arising from deployments, as well as their moral value, may help to increase volunteering. Efforts to improve the support given to responders should focus on identifying how to better support families, preparing all staff members for dealing with death and the risk of contagion, providing opportunities for staff to more frequently experience the uplifting aspects of deployment, resolving inter-organisational difficulties, and educating others about the low risk posed by responders on their return.

Indexed as

distresshumanitarian responseInfectious diseasespsychological supporttrainingwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID27863536
PMCPMC5116059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.