Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27863519›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2016

TET-dependent regulation of retrotransposable elements in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Lorenzo de la Rica, Özgen Deniz, Kevin C L Cheng, Christopher D Todd, Cristina Cruz, Jonathan Houseley, Miguel R Branco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
27.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A cross-talk between p16High senescence and cellular reprogramming.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TET activity safeguards pluripotency throughout embryonic dormancy.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo de la RicaBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Özgen DenizBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Kevin C L ChengBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Christopher D ToddBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Cristina CruzEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Jonathan HouseleyEpigenetics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Miguel R BrancoBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, QMUL, London, E1 2AT, UK. m.branco@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBBabraham Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 101225/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust 110216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTen-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes oxidise DNA methylation as part of an active demethylation pathway. Despite extensive research into the role of TETs in genome regulation, little is known about their effect on transposable elements (TEs), which make up nearly half of the mouse and human genomes. Epigenetic mechanisms controlling TEs have the potential to affect their mobility and to drive the co-adoption of TEs for the benefit of the host.

resultsWe performed a detailed investigation of the role of TET enzymes in the regulation of TEs in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). We find that TET1 and TET2 bind multiple TE classes that harbour a variety of epigenetic signatures indicative of different functional roles. TETs co-bind with pluripotency factors to enhancer-like TEs that interact with highly expressed genes in ESCs whose expression is partly maintained by TET2-mediated DNA demethylation. TETs and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are also strongly enriched at the 5' UTR of full-length, evolutionarily young LINE-1 elements, a pattern that is conserved in human ESCs. TETs drive LINE-1 demethylation, but surprisingly, LINE-1s are kept repressed through additional TET-dependent activities. We find that the SIN3A co-repressive complex binds to LINE-1s, ensuring their repression in a TET1-dependent manner.

conclusionsOur data implicate TET enzymes in the evolutionary dynamics of TEs, both in the context of exaptation processes and of retrotransposition control. The dual role of TET action on LINE-1s may reflect the evolutionary battle between TEs and the host.

Indexed as

Mouse Embryonic Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceProto-Oncogene ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRetroelementsSin3 Histone Deacetylase and Corepressor ComplexDioxygenasesDNA-Binding ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRetroelementsSIN3A transcription factorSin3 Histone Deacetylase and Corepressor ComplexTET1 protein, mouseTet2 protein, mouseDNA methylationEmbryonic stem cellsEnhancersHydroxymethylationLINE-1RetrotransposonsTen-eleven translocation enzymes

Identifiers

PMID27863519
PMCPMC5116139
OpenAlexW2551007470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.