Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27863515›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2016

Feasibility trial of a scalable psychological intervention for women affected by urban adversity and gender-based violence in Nairobi.

Katie S Dawson, Alison Schafer, Dorothy Anjuri, Lincoln Ndogoni, Caroline Musyoki, Marit Sijbrandij, Mark van Ommeren, Richard A Bryant

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03359486 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Feasibility Study of Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsDepressionArmsGroup problem management plus, Enhanced treatment as usual
NCT03567083 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

STRENGTHS: Fostering Responsive Mental Health Systems in the Syrian Refugee Crisis - The Turkey Site

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Sehir UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled46ConditionsAnxiety, Depression, Posttraumatic Stress DisorderArmsProblem Management Plus (PM+)
NCT03747055 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Group Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled611ConditionsDepression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Psychological DistressArmsGroup problem management plus, Enhanced treatment as usual
NCT03960892 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Syrian REfuGees MeNTal HealTH Care Systems

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Sehir UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled369ConditionsAnxiety, Depression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Psychological DistressArmsProblem Management Plus (PM+)
NCT04617262 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Feasibility Study of Remote Problem Management Plus to Improve Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by COVID-

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe New SchoolRan2021 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsDepression, Anxiety Disorders, Psychological DistressArmsRemote Problem Management Plus
NCT05033210 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Mental Health Problems Among Persons Without Personal Housing in the Context of the COVID-19 Epidemic: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled210ConditionsPsychological Distress, Quality of Life, Psychosocial InterventionArmsPsychological First Aid (PFA), Care as Usual (CAU), Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM), Problem Management Plus (PM+)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie S DawsonUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Alison SchaferWorld Vision International/Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Dorothy AnjuriWorld Vision Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lincoln NdogoniPsychological Support Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Caroline MusyokiWorld Vision Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Marit SijbrandijVU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mark van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. r.bryant@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUVision Australia · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving in conditions of chronic adversity renders many women more vulnerable to experiencing gender-based violence (GBV). In addition to GBV's physical and social consequences, the psychological effects can be pervasive. Access to evidence-based psychological interventions that seek to support the mental health of women affected by such adversity is rare in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsThe current study evaluates a brief evidence-informed psychological intervention developed by the World Health Organization for adults impacted by adversity (Problem Management Plus; PM+). A feasibility randomised control trial (RCT) was conducted to inform a fully powered trial. Community health workers delivered the intervention to 70 women residing in three peri-urban settings in Nairobi, Kenya. Women, among whom 80% were survivors of GBV (N = 56), were randomised to receive five sessions of either PM+ (n = 35) by community health workers or enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU; n = 35).

resultsPM+ was not associated with any adverse events. Although the study was not powered to identify effects and accordingly did not identify effects on the primary outcome measure of general psychological distress, women survivors of adversity, including GBV, who received PM+ displayed greater reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms following treatment than those receiving ETAU.

conclusionsThis feasibility study suggests that PM+ delivered by lay health workers is an acceptable and safe intervention to reach women experiencing common mental disorders and be inclusive for those affected by GBV and can be studied in a RCT in this setting. The study sets the stage for a fully powered, definitive controlled trial to assess this potentially effective intervention.

trial registrationACTRN12614001291673 , 10/12/2014, retrospectively registered during the recruitment phase.

Indexed as

Urban PopulationAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMental DisordersPsychotherapySurvivorsViolenceWomenGender based violenceMental healthPsychological interventionTraumaTrial

Identifiers

PMID27863515
PMCPMC5116169
OpenAlexW2554147083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.