Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27863441›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Sulforaphane inhibits proliferation and invasive activity of everolimus-resistant kidney cancer cells in vitro.

Eva Juengel, Sebastian Maxeiner, Jochen Rutz, Saira Justin, Frederik Roos, Wael Khoder, Igor Tsaur, Karen Nelson, Wolf O Bechstein, Axel Haferkamp and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic Value ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva JuengelDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sebastian MaxeinerDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jochen RutzDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Saira JustinDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Frederik RoosDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Wael KhoderDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Igor TsaurDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karen NelsonDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Wolf O BechsteinDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Axel HaferkampDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Roman A BlahetaDepartment of Urology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, everolimus, has improved the outcome of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), improvement is temporary due to the development of drug resistance. Since many patients encountering resistance turn to alternative/complementary treatment options, an investigation was initiated to evaluate whether the natural compound, sulforaphane (SFN), influences growth and invasive activity of everolimus-resistant (RCCres) compared to everolimus-sensitive (RCCpar) RCC cell lines in vitro. RCC cells were exposed to different concentrations of SFN and cell growth, cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, cell cycle regulating proteins, the mTOR-akt signaling axis, adhesion to human vascular endothelium and immobilized collagen, chemotactic activity, and influence on surface integrin receptor expression were investigated. SFN caused a significant reduction in both RCCres and RCCpar cell growth and proliferation, which correlated with an elevation in G2/M- and S-phase cells. SFN induced a marked decrease in the cell cycle activating proteins cdk1 and cyclin B and siRNA knock-down of cdk1 and cyclin B resulted in significantly diminished RCC cell growth. SFN also modulated adhesion and chemotaxis, which was associated with reduced expression of the integrin subtypes α5, α6, and β4. Distinct differences were seen in RCCres adhesion and chemotaxis (diminished by SFN) and RCCpar adhesion (enhanced by SFN) and chemotaxis (not influenced by SFN). Functional blocking of integrin subtypes demonstrated divergent action on RCC binding and invasion, depending on RCC cell sensitivity to everolimus. Therefore, SFN administration could hold potential for treating RCC patients with established resistance towards everolimus.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCDC2 Protein KinaseCell AdhesionCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCyclin BDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEverolimusHumansIntegrin alpha5IsothiocyanatesKidney NeoplasmsRNA, Small InterferingAntineoplastic AgentsCDC2 Protein KinaseCyclin BEverolimusIntegrin alpha5IsothiocyanatesMTOR protein, humanRNA, Small InterferingsulforaphaneSulfoxidesTOR Serine-Threonine Kinasescomplementary and alternative medicineinvasionproliferationrenal cell carcinomasulforaphane

Identifiers

PMID27863441
PMCPMC5356730
OpenAlexW2549502634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.