Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27863422›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

In silico and in vitro drug screening identifies new therapeutic approaches for Ewing sarcoma.

Ziyan Y Pessetto, Bin Chen, Hani Alturkmani, Stephen Hyter, Colleen A Flynn, Michael Baltezor, Yan Ma, Howard G Rosenthal, Kathleen A Neville, Scott J Weir and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endosomal Acid-Base Homeostasis in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Systems Biology Analysis for Ewing Sarcoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ziyan Y PessettoDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Bin ChenInstitute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Hani AlturkmaniDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Stephen HyterDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Colleen A FlynnLead Development Optimization Shared Resource, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Biotechnology Innovation and Optimization Center, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Michael BaltezorLead Development Optimization Shared Resource, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Biotechnology Innovation and Optimization Center, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Yan MaDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Howard G RosenthalUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Kathleen A NevilleDepartment of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Scott J WeirUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Atul J ButteInstitute for Computational Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew K GodwinDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USThe University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USArkansas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROY A. JENSEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
Repositioning drugs for the treatment of small cell lung cancerR01GM079719 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BUTTE, ATUL J · 2006 to 2015
$4.4M
The Molecular Actions of Imatinib Mesylate in GISTsR01CA106588 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GODWIN, ANDREW K., VON MEHREN, MARGARET · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchKL2TR000119 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000119NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000001NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106588NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-term overall survival of Ewing sarcoma (EWS) patients remains poor; less than 30% of patients with metastatic or recurrent disease survive despite aggressive combinations of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. To identify new therapeutic options, we employed a multi-pronged approach using in silico predictions of drug activity via an integrated bioinformatics approach in parallel with an in vitro screen of FDA-approved drugs. Twenty-seven drugs and forty-six drugs were identified, respectively, to have anti-proliferative effects for EWS, including several classes of drugs in both screening approaches. Among these drugs, 30 were extensively validated as mono-therapeutic agents and 9 in 14 various combinations in vitro. Two drugs, auranofin, a thioredoxin reductase inhibitor, and ganetespib, an HSP90 inhibitor, were predicted to have anti-cancer activities in silico and were confirmed active across a panel of genetically diverse EWS cells. When given in combination, the survival rate in vivo was superior compared to auranofin or ganetespib alone. Importantly, extensive formulations, dose tolerance, and pharmacokinetics studies demonstrated that auranofin requires alternative delivery routes to achieve therapeutically effective levels of the gold compound. These combined screening approaches provide a rapid means to identify new treatment options for patients with a rare and often-fatal disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAuranofinCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalComputer SimulationDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIn Vitro TechniquesOncogene Proteins, FusionProto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1RNA-Binding Protein EWSSarcoma, EwingTranscription FactorsTriazolesAuranofinEWS1-WT1 fusion protein, humanEWS-ERG fusion protein, humanEWS-FLI fusion proteinOncogene Proteins, FusionProto-Oncogene Protein c-fli-1RNA-Binding Protein EWSSTA 9090Transcription FactorsTriazolesauranofindrug repurposingEwing sarcomaganetespibhigh-throughput screening

Identifiers

PMID27863422
PMCPMC5354814
OpenAlexW2551212791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.