ArticleOncotarget2016
Enumeration and targeted analysis of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in CTCs captured by a label-free platform: Comparison to ctDNA and tissue in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability of BRAF mutation detection using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysisMedicine · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Analytical and clinical validation of a novel CE-IVD kit forThe journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in non-metastatic colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Dual Biomarker Strategies for Liquid Biopsy: Integrating Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA for Enhanced Tumor Monitoring.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of solid tumors with BRAF mutations.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Review
- Recent Advancements in the Application of Circulating Tumor DNA as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Cancers.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
- Article
- Molecular Profiling of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Tumour DNA: Complementary Insights from a Single Blood Sample Utilising the ParsortixCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Direct comparison of an ultrasensitive real-time PCR assay with droplet digital PCR for the detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The potential role of minimal/molecular residual disease in colorectal cancer: curative surgery, radiotherapy and beyond.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023Review
- Assessment of Different Circulating Tumor Cell Platforms for Uveal Melanoma: Potential Impact for Future Routine Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Circulating tumour cells for early detection of clinically relevant cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Single-Cell Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells from Patients with Colorectal Cancer Captured with a Dielectrophoresis-Based Micropore System.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in resectable CLM: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Open life sciences · 2023Review
- Mutation analysis of circulating tumor DNA and paired ascites and tumor tissues in ovarian cancer.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
- Liquid Biopsies in Colorectal Liver Metastases: Towards the Era of Precision Oncologic Surgery.Cancers · 2022Review
- Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Application of Microfluidics in Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Inertial Microfluidics Enabling Clinical Research.Micromachines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) requires multimodal therapeutic approaches and need for monitoring tumor plasticity. Liquid biopsy biomarkers, including CTCs and ctDNA, hold promise for evaluating treatment response in real-time and guiding therapeutic modifications. From 15 patients with advanced CRC undergoing liver metastasectomy with curative intent, we collected 41 blood samples at different time points before and after surgery for CTC isolation and quantification using label-free Vortex technology. For mutational profiling, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA hotspot mutations were analyzed in CTCs and ctDNA from 23 samples, nine matched liver metastases and three primary tumor samples. Mutational patterns were compared. 80% of patient blood samples were positive for CTCs, using a healthy baseline value as threshold (0.4 CTCs/mL), and 81.4% of captured cells were EpCAM+ CTCs. At least one mutation was detected in 78% of our blood samples. Among 23 matched CTC and ctDNA samples, we found a concordance of 78.2% for KRAS, 73.9% for BRAF and 91.3% for PIK3CA mutations. In several cases, CTCs exhibited a mutation that was not detected in ctDNA, and vice versa. Complementary assessment of both CTCs and ctDNA appears advantageous to assess dynamic tumor profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.