Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27863133›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2017

Shape Memory Silk Protein Sponges for Minimally Invasive Tissue Regeneration.

Joseph E Brown, Jodie E Moreau, Alison M Berman, Heather J McSherry, Jeannine M Coburn, Daniel F Schmidt, David L Kaplan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. UsingMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph E BrownDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Jodie E MoreauDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Alison M BermanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Heather J McSherryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Jeannine M CoburnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Daniel F SchmidtDepartment of Plastics Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Tufts University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous silk protein scaffolds are designed to display shape memory characteristics and volumetric recovery following compression. Two strategies are utilized to realize shape recovery: addition of hygroscopic plasticizers like glycerol, and tyrosine modifications with hydrophilic sulfonic acid chemistries. Silk sponges are evaluated for recovery following 80% compressive strain, total porosity, pore size distribution, secondary structure development, in vivo volume retention, cell infiltration, and inflammatory responses. Glycerol-modified sponges recover up to 98.3% of their original dimensions following compression, while sulfonic acid/glycerol modified sponges swell in water up to 71 times their compressed volume, well in excess of their original size. Longer silk extraction times (lower silk molecular weights) and higher glycerol concentrations yielded greater flexibility and shape fidelity, with no loss in modulus following compression. Sponges are over 95% porous, with secondary structure analysis indicating glycerol-induced β-sheet physical crosslinking. Tyrosine modifications with sulfonic acid interfere with β-sheet formation. Glycerol-modified sponges exhibit improved rates of cellular infiltration at subcutaneous implant sites with minimal immune response in mice. They also degrade more rapidly than unmodified sponges, a result posited to be cell-mediated. Overall, this work suggests that silk sponges may be useful for minimally invasive deployment in soft tissue augmentation procedures.

Indexed as

Materials TestingSilkAnimalsFemaleGlycerolMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRegenerationSulfonic AcidsGlycerolSilkSulfonic Acidsglycerolminimally invasiveshape memorysilksponges

Identifiers

PMID27863133
PMCPMC5266640
OpenAlexW2552135979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.