Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27862882›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2017

Contraceptive method preferences and provision after termination of pregnancy: a population-based analysis of women obtaining care with the British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

Ara Aiken, P A Lohr, C E Aiken, T Forsyth, J Trussell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ara AikenLBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
P A LohrBritish Pregnancy Advisory Service, Warwickshire, UK.
C E AikenUniversity Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NIHR Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
T ForsythBritish Pregnancy Advisory Service, Warwickshire, UK.
J TrussellOffice of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HAYWARD, MARK D. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SALGANIK, MATTHEW J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine contraceptive choices among women seeking termination of pregnancy (TOP) and the provision of the chosen methods.

designPopulation-based study.

settingBritish Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) clinics in England and Wales. POPULATION: Between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014, 211 215 women had a TOP at BPAS, were offered contraceptive counselling, and were eligible to obtain contraception at no cost.

methodsWe examined electronic records from BPAS and assessed the proportions of women who accepted contraceptive counselling and chose a contraceptive method, as well as the distributions of methods chosen, analysed by provider and by TOP type. We calculated the proportions receiving their chosen method and the methods chosen by women using no method at conception. We used logistic regression to examine the factors associated with choice of an intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) or implant.

main outcome measuresPost-TOP contraceptive method choice. Receipt of chosen method post-TOP.

resultsEighty-five per cent of women accepted contraceptive counselling and 51% chose to obtain a method from BPAS rather than from a GP or contraception and sexual health clinic post-TOP. [correction added on 25 November 2016 after first online publication: 51% has been inserted in the preceding sentence.] Among those who wanted to receive contraception from BPAS, 51% chose an IUC or implant and 19% chose oral contraceptives. Ninety-one per cent of women who obtained contraception from BPAS received their chosen method. Women were more likely to choose an IUC or implant if they obtained contraception from BPAS, had a surgical TOP, were parous, young, white, or had one or more previous TOPs.

conclusionsThe standards set for patient-centred TOP care should emphasise the need for a full range of contraceptive options to be offered and provided post-TOP. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Uptake targets for long-acting reversible methods do not reflect women's post-TOP contraceptive preferences.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdultChildChoice BehaviorContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingEnglandFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyWalesYoung AdultContraceptive counsellingcontraceptive preferencescontraceptive service provisionpost-TOP contraception

Identifiers

PMID27862882
PMCPMC5506553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.