Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27862108›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2017

Predictors of dropout in face-to-face and internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa in a randomized controlled trial.

Hunna J Watson, Michele D Levine, Stephanie C Zerwas, Robert M Hamer, Ross D Crosby, Caroline S Sprecher, Amy O'Brien, Benjamin Zimmer, Sara M Hofmeier, Hans Kordy and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. An exploratory investigation of predictors of outcome in face-to-face and online cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hunna J WatsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-8405-381X
Michele D LevineDepartment of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Stephanie C ZerwasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Robert M HamerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ross D CrosbyNeuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, North Dakota.
Caroline S SprecherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Amy O'BrienEating Disorders Program, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Department of Health in Western Australia, Perth, Western, Australia.
Benjamin ZimmerCenter for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sara M HofmeierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Hans KordyCenter for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus MoessnerCenter for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christine M PeatDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cristin D RunfolaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5841-1556
Marsha D MarcusDepartment of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cynthia M BulikDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USGovernment of Western Australia Department of Health · AUUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

Optimizing Technology in the Treatment of Bulimia NervosaR01MH080065 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BULIK, CYNTHIA M · 2008 to 2012
$3.2M
Developmental Psychopathology of Restrictive and Binge Eating in ChildhoodK01MH100435 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZERWAS, STEPHANIE CHRISTINE · 2013 to 2015
$488k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH100435NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to identify predictors and moderators of failure to engage (i.e., pretreatment attrition) and dropout in both Internet-based and traditional face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa. We also sought to determine if Internet-based treatment reduced failure to engage and dropout.

methodParticipants (N = 191, 98% female) were randomized to Internet-based CBT (CBT4BN) or traditional face-to-face group CBT (CBTF2F). Sociodemographics, clinical history, eating disorder severity, comorbid psychopathology, health status and quality of life, personality and temperament, and treatment-related factors were investigated as predictors.

resultsFailure to engage was associated with lower perceived treatment credibility and expectancy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.97) and body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.18). Dropout was predicted by not having a college degree (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.81), novelty seeking (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), previous CBT experience (HR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.71), and randomization to the individual's nonpreferred treatment format (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.96). DISCUSSION: Those most at risk of failure to engage had a higher BMI and perceived treatment as less credible and less likely to succeed. Dropout was associated with less education, higher novelty seeking, previous CBT experience, and a mismatch between preferred and assigned treatment. Contrary to expectations, Internet-based CBT did not reduce failure to engage or dropout. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.(Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:569-577).

Indexed as

AdultBulimia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansInternetMalePatient DropoutsQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomebulimia nervosacognitive-behavioral therapydropoutfailure to engagerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27862108
PMCPMC5429209
OpenAlexW2555167846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.