Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27861874›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2017

A Real-World Multicentre Retrospective Study of Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab and Maintenance Therapy as First-Line for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Teresa Gamucci, Lucia Mentuccia, Clara Natoli, Isabella Sperduti, Alessandra Cassano, Andrea Michelotti, Luigi Di Lauro, Domenico Sergi, Alessandra Fabi, Maria G Sarobba and 21 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Teresa GamucciMedical Oncology Unit, Frosinone, Italy.
Lucia MentucciaMedical Oncology Unit, Frosinone, Italy.
Clara NatoliDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell' Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale - CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy.
Isabella SperdutiBio-Statistics Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra CassanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Andrea MichelottiOncology Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Luigi Di LauroDivision of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Domenico SergiDivision of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra FabiDivision of Medical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Maria G SarobbaMedical Oncology Unit, Nuoro, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy.
Maddalena BarbaDivision of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela MagnolfiMedical Oncology Unit, Frosinone, Italy.
Marcello Maugeri-SaccàDivision of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Ernesto RossiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Valentina SiniDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy.
Antonino GrassadoniaDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Centro Scienze dell' Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale - CeSI-MeT, Chieti, Italy.
Domenica PellegriniDivision of Medical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Antonino AstoneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Cecilia NisticòDivision of Medical Oncology 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Franco AngeliniMedical Oncology Unit, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano, Rome, Italy.
Angela VaccaroMedical Oncology Unit, Frosinone, Italy.
Arianna PellegrinoMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy.
Claudia De AngelisOncology Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Michela PalleschiMedical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Luca MoscettiMedical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.
Ilaria BertoliniOncology Unit I, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Simonetta BuglioniDepartment of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Antonio GiordanoSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Laura PizzutiDivision of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia ViciDivision of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
National Cancer Institute · MYAccademia di Belle Arti di Frosinone · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITAssociazione Istituzione Libera Università Nuorese · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITOspedale Regina Apostolorum · ITOspedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli · ITPoliclinico di Modena · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bevacizumab in combination with taxanes in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients has shown improved progression-free survival (PFS), despite the lack of clear overall survival (OS) benefit. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of paclitaxel-bevacizumab and of maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (BM) and endocrine therapy (ET) in the real-world practice. We identified 314 HER2-negative MBC patients treated in 12 cancer centers. Overall, the median PFS and OS were 14 and 40 months, respectively. Among the 254 patients potentially eligible for BM, 183 received BM after paclitaxel discontinuation until progression/toxicity. PFS and OS were improved in patients who had received BM in comparison with those potentially eligible but who did not receive BM (P< 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Results were confirmed when adjusting for propensity score. Among the 216 hormone-receptor positive patients eligible for BM, a more favorable PFS and OS were observed when maintenance ET was administered (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that PS, BM, number of disease sites and maintenance ET were related to PFS, while response and maintenance ET were related to OS. In hormone-receptor positive patients, BM produced a significant PFS and a trend towards OS benefit only in absence of maintenance ET (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.06, respectively). In the triple-negative subgroup, we observed a trend towards a better OS for patients who received BM (P = 0.06), without differences in PFS (P = 0.21). Our results confirmed the efficacy of first-line paclitaxel-bevacizumab in real-world practice; both BM and maintenance ET significantly improved PFS and OS compared to no maintenance therapies. J. Cell. Physiol. 232: 1571-1578, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Maintenance ChemotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBevacizumabBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm MetastasisPaclitaxelProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesBevacizumabErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID27861874
PMCPMC6220933
OpenAlexW2557697712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.