SynthesisMedicine2016
Trends of triple negative breast cancer research (2007-2015): A bibliometric study.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Research on therapeutic clinical trials including immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Publication trend, resource utilization, and impact of the US National Cancer Database: A systematic review.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Knowledge mapping of ultrasound technology and triple-negative breast cancer: a visual and bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Turkish Retinoblastoma Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (1966-2024).Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-influential papers in the field of anti-diabetic drugs.Future science OA · 2024Article
- Publication trends of primary angle-closure disease during 1991-2022: a bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Publication Trends of Research on Retinoblastoma During 2001-2021: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Systematic mapping of organophosphate contaminant (OPC) research trends between 1990 and 2018.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020Review
- A Bibliometric Review of Publications on Oxidative Stress and Chemobrain: 1990-2019.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research Assessing the Use of Acupuncture for Pain Treatment Over the Past 20 Years.Journal of pain research · 2020Article
- Article
- Tracking knowledge evolution, hotspots and future directions of emerging technologies in cancers research: a bibliometrics review.Journal of Cancer · 2019Review
- The recent landscape of cancer research worldwide: a bibliometric and network analysis.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Trends on PMEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- China's growing contribution to sepsis research from 1984 to 2014: A bibliometric study.Medicine · 2017Article
- Global cocaine intoxication research trends during 1975-2015: a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype. However, there have been limited data to evaluate the trend of TNBC research. This study aims to investigate the trend of TNBC research and compare the contribution of research from different regions, organizations, and authors.
methodsTNBC-related publications from 2007 to 2015 were retrieved from the Web of Science database. Excel 2013 (Redmond, Washington, USA), GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Prism Software Inc., San Diego, CA), and VOSviewer (Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands) software were used to analyze the trend of TNBC research. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
resultsA total of 1695 papers were identified and were cited 34,078 times with a time limit of May 27, 2016. The United States accounted for 43.10% of the articles, 57.59% of the citations, and the highest H-index (64). China ranked second in total number of articles, but seventh in citation frequency (1998) and ninth in H-index (21). The journal Breast Cancer Research and Treatment had the highest number of publications. The author, Narod SA, has published the most papers in this field (30). The keyword "receptor" was mentioned the most, 1489 times, and the word "myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1)" was the latest hot spot by 2015.
conclusionLiterature growth related to TNBC is expanding rapidly in recent years. The quality of the articles from China still requires improvement. Newest progress of the TNBC research may be released by the journal Breast Cancer Research and Treatment first. Narod SA, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, and Hortobagyi GN may be good candidates for collaborative research in this field. MCL-1 is an emerging topic that should be closely observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.