Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27860449›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2017

Cerium oxide nanoparticles in neuroprotection and considerations for efficacy and safety.

Beverly A Rzigalinski, Charles S Carfagna, Marion Ehrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Influence of EuInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beverly A RzigalinskiEdward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Charles S CarfagnaMolecular Materials Discovery Center, Macromolecular Innovations Institute, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Marion EhrichVirginia Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

Cerium oxide nanoparticles for the treatment of traumatic brain injuryR15NS072873 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE · PI RZIGALINSKI, BEVERLY A, WHITING, MARK · 2011 to 2011
$405k
NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS072873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerium oxide nanoparticles have widespread use in the materials industry, and have recently come into consideration for biomedical use due to their potent regenerative antioxidant properties. Given that the brain is one of the most highly oxidative organs in the body, it is subject to some of the greatest levels of oxidative stress, particularly in neurodegenerative disease. Therefore, cerium oxide nanoparticles are currently being investigated for efficacy in several neurodegenerative disorders and have shown promising levels of neuroprotection. This review discusses the basis for cerium oxide nanoparticle use in neurodegenerative disease and its hypothesized mechanism of action. The review focuses on an up-to-date summary of in vivo work with cerium oxide nanoparticles in animal models of neurodegenerative disease. Additionally, we examine the current state of information regarding biodistribution, toxicity, and safety for cerium oxide nanoparticles at the in vivo level. Finally, we discuss future directions that are necessary if this nanopharmaceutical is to move up from the bench to the bedside. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2017, 9:e1444. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1444 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

NeuroprotectionAnimalsAntioxidantsCeriumHumansNanoparticlesNeurodegenerative DiseasesOxidative StressTissue DistributionAntioxidantsceric oxideCerium

Identifiers

PMID27860449
PMCPMC5422143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.