Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27859982›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2017

Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on neural processing in post-stroke aphasia.

Robert Darkow, Andrew Martin, Anna Würtz, Agnes Flöel, Marcus Meinzer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04166513 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of tDCS in Language Recovery and Reorganization in Chronic Aphasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2019 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsStroke, AphasiaArmsTargeted Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Active Control Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Phonologic-Focused Speech Therapy, Semantic-Focused Speech Therapy
NCT06010030 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Clinical Trial of tDCS to Remediate Phonological Impairment in Aphasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2023 to 2033Enrolled200ConditionsAphasia, StrokeArmsTargeted Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Speech Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2021
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Targeted neurorehabilitation strategies in post-stroke aphasia.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert DarkowDepartment of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, and Center of Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Andrew MartinThe University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane Queensland, 4029, Australia.
Anna WürtzDepartment of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, and Center of Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Agnes FlöelDepartment of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, and Center of Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, 10117, Germany.
Marcus MeinzerDepartment of Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, and Center of Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, 10117, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can enhance recovery after stroke. However, fundamental knowledge about how tDCS impacts neural processing in the lesioned human brain is currently lacking. In the present study, it was investigated how tDCS modulates brain function in patients with post-stroke language impairment (aphasia). In a cross-over, randomized trial, patients named pictures of common objects during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Concurrently, excitatory (anodal-) or sham-tDCS (1 mA, 20 min, or 30 s, respectively) was administered to the left primary motor cortex, a montage with demonstrated potential to improve aphasic language. By choosing stimuli that could reliable be named by the patients, the authors aimed to derive a pure measure of stimulation effects that was independent of treatment or performance effects and to assess how tDCS interacts with the patients' residual language network. Univariate fMRI data analysis revealed reduced activity in domain-general regions mediating high-level cognitive control during anodal-tDCS. Independent component functional network analysis demonstrated selectively increased language network activity and an inter-correlated shift from higher to lower frequency bands, indicative of increased within-network communication. Compared with healthy controls, anodal-tDCS resulted in overall "normalization" of brain function in the patients. These results demonstrate for the first time how tDCS modulates neural processing in stroke patients. Such information is crucial to assure that behavioral treatments targeting specific neural circuits overlap with regions that are modulated by tDCS, thereby maximizing stimulation effects during therapy. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1518-1531, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAphasiaCase-Control StudiesCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNamesOxygenPhotic StimulationPrincipal Component AnalysisOxygenaphasiabrain stimulationfunctional magnetic resonance imaginglanguagestroke

Identifiers

PMID27859982
PMCPMC6866985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.