Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27859739›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2016

Transcriptomic responses in the oral cavity of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice following exposure to Cr(VI): Implications for risk assessment.

Chad M Thompson, Julia E Rager, Mina Suh, Caroline L Ring, Deborah M Proctor, Laurie C Haws, Rebecca C Fry, Mark A Harris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. High-Throughput Screening Data Interpretation in the Context of In Vivo Transcriptomic Responses to Oral Cr(VI) Exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chad M ThompsonToxStrategies, Inc, Katy, Texas.
Julia E RagerToxStrategies, Inc, Austin, Texas.
Mina SuhToxStrategies, Inc, Mission Viejo, California.
Caroline L RingToxStrategies, Inc, Austin, Texas.
Deborah M ProctorToxStrategies, Inc, Mission Viejo, California.
Laurie C HawsToxStrategies, Inc, Austin, Texas.
Rebecca C FryDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Mark A HarrisToxStrategies, Inc, Katy, Texas.
BioStrategies (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] in drinking water was previously reported to increase oral tumor incidence in F344 rats. To investigate the mode of action for these tumors, transcriptomic profiles in oral mucosa samples of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice were analyzed following exposure to 0.1-180 ppm Cr(VI) for 7 or 90 days. In rats, genome-wide microarray analyses identified no significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at either time point. In mice, 14 and 1 DEGs were respectively identified after 7 and 90 days of exposure. Therefore, relaxed statistical criteria were employed to identify potential DEGs (pDEGs), followed by high-throughput benchmark dose modeling to identify responsive pDEGs for pathway enrichment analysis. This identified 288 and 168 pDEGs in the rat oral mucosa, of which only 20 and 7 showed evidence of dose-response. No significant pathway enrichment was obtained with either pDEG or dose-responsive pDEG lists. Similar results were obtained in mice. These analyses indicate a negligible transcriptional response in the oral mucosa of both species. Comparison of the total number of gene changes in the oral mucosa of rats and mice with responses in the duodenum of animals from the same study demonstrated remarkable dose-response concordance across tissues and species as a function of tissue chromium concentration. The low chromium levels in the oral mucosa and negligible transcript response are consistent with an absence of tissue lesions. These findings are used to compare the merits of linear and nonlinear approaches for deriving toxicity criteria based on the oral tumors in rats. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 57:706-716, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogens, EnvironmentalChromiumDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyMice, Inbred StrainsMouth MucosaRats, Inbred F344Risk AssessmentSpecies SpecificityTranscriptomeWater Pollutants, ChemicalCarcinogens, EnvironmentalChromiumchromium hexavalent ionWater Pollutants, Chemicalhexavalent chromiummode of actionrisk assessmenttranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID27859739
PMCPMC5215477
OpenAlexW2551849413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.