Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27859057›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2017

Supplemental Insurance and Racial Health Disparities under Medicare Part B.

Christopher S Brunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher S BruntDepartment of Finance and Economics, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of preferences, socioeconomic status (SES), and supplemental insurance (SI) on racial/ethnic disparities in the probability and use of services at physicians' offices, hospitals, and emergency departments among Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part B. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: This study includes black and white beneficiaries from the 2009-2011 panel of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey who were enrolled in Medicare Part B. Logit and negative binomial multivariate regression analysis were used in conjunction with rank-and-replace methods to determine factors influencing utilization and black-white utilization disparities. PRINCIPAL

findingsAmong Part B beneficiaries, significant disparities exist for each studied service. Examining contributing factors, 12-19 percent of the black-white health-adjusted difference in the probability of use is explained by differences in SES, whereas differences in the distribution of SI accounts for 20 percent or more. For volume, SES is found to account for 2-11 percent of differences with SI making up another 9-10 percent.

conclusionsA substantial portion of the difference in black-white beneficiary use of outpatient services is due to SI. Policies aimed at increasing coverage are likely to increase the probability of visits with modest increases in volume.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicare Part BSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesWhite Peopleaccess/demand/utilization of serviceshealth economicsMedicareRacial/ethnic differences in health and health care

Identifiers

PMID27859057
PMCPMC5682138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.