SynthesisMedicine2016
Is adjunctive treatment with medication of liver-soothing-oriented method beneficial for depression after cerebrovascular accident?: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical application of Chinese herbal medication to depression: A narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Relationship between serum vitamin D levels and inflammatory markers in acute stroke patients.Brain and behavior · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdjunctive treatment with medication of liver-soothing-oriented method (MLSM) is one of the most commonly used approaches for subjects with depression after cerebrovascular accident (DCVA) in China. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the outcome of MLSM treatment in subjects with DCVA using relevant published literature.
methodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, Sinomed, and VIP were used to collect all publications until March 2016. Randomized controlled trials comparing treatments with and without MLSM for subjects with DCVA were included. The quality of each publication was assessed based on the recent Handbook (5.1 version) for Cochrane Reviewers. Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.3 software was applied for data analysis.
resultsThirty studies, including 2599 cases, were identified and collected. Adjunctive treatment with MLSM noticeably enhanced total effective rates (odds ratio 3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.92-4.85, I = 0%, P = 0.96) in comparison to non-MLSM conventional pharmacotherapy. Compared to non-MLSM treatment, the changes of Hamilton Depression Scale in adjunctive treatment with MLSM, respectively, decreased and showed beneficial effects after 3 weeks (weighted mean difference [WMD] -4.83; 95% CI -6.82 to -2.83; I = 86%, P < 0.001), 4 weeks (WMD -4.20; 95% CI -5.06 to -3.33; I = 78%, P < 0.001), 6 weeks (WMD -3.36; 95% CI -4.05 to -2.68; I = 54%, P = 0.02), 8 weeks (WMD -4.83; 95% CI -5.62 to -4.04; I = 73%, P < 0.001), and 12 weeks (WMD -2.88; 95% CI -4.09 to -1.67; I = 58%, P = 0.09). As for changes in inflammatory cytokine levels, adjunctive treatment with MLSM was associated with a significant decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, and interleukin-1β levels in comparison to non-MLSM treatment. Moreover, there were positive effects on score changes for National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, activities of daily living, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Modified Edinburgh Scandinavian Stroke Scale, and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. No serious adverse events were reported.
conclusionMLSM appears to improve symptoms of depressive disorders, enhance immediate responses, and the quality of life in subjects with DCVA. The positive action of MLSM might be potentially connected with its immunoregulating effects. More prospective trials with strict design and larger sample sizes are warranted to clarify its effectiveness and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.