SynthesisMedicine2016
Effect of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP) versus nitroglycerin in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of vasodilators for heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Nesiritide in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic value of X-box binding protein 1 and phospholipase A2 in myocardial injury after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- The Effect of Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide Combined with Xinmailong on Heart Failure and Its Impact on Cardiac Function and Inflammatory Response.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide on efficacy, hemodynamics and NT-proBNP in elderly patients with heart failure.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Effect of levosimendan combined with recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide on diuretic resistance.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2021Article
- A meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of rhBNP in treating patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.American journal of translational research · 2021Review
- Role of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide combined with sodium nitroprusside in improving quality of life and cardiac function in patients with acute heart failure.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Dysregulated micro-RNAs and long noncoding RNAs in cardiac development and pediatric heart failure.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020Review
- BNP and NT-proBNP as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Cardiac Dysfunction in Both Clinical and Forensic Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Protective effects of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide in perioperative period during open heart surgery.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was the first to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP) versus nitroglycerin (NIT) in patients with heart failure (HF).
methodsThe electronic databases were systematically searched to identify available studies. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were analyzed to assess the mortality, readmission, hypotension, and renal dysfunction in the comparison of rhBNP and NIT therapies.
resultsFinal 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 782 patients with HF were carried out in our study. The pooled OR of mortality, readmission, and hypotension showed that no significant difference was found in both drugs (P > 0.05), with the absence of heterogeneity. The incidence of renal dysfunction was not significant difference in both groups (P = 0.85). The pooled OR from 2 studies of Asian population using multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of rhBNP was correlated with a significantly decreased risk of renal dysfunction (I = 0.0%, OR = 0.19, P = 0.001). Possible publication bias was not detected using Egger's test (P > 0.05).
conclusionsThe results suggested that rhBNP and NIT therapies were not significant difference in mortality, readmission, and hypotension. The use of rhBNP may become a useful predictor of renal dysfunction in Asian patients with HF. Additional studies are needed for Caucasian population with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.