Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27858538›Full record

ReviewJournal of oncology practice2016

Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Amye J Tevaarwerk, Kari B Wisinski, Ruth M O'Regan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oncology practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amye J TevaarwerkUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Kari B WisinskiUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Ruth M O'ReganUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
WORD PROCESSORP30CA013330 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN C. ALMO · 1985 to 2026
$111.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013330NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has evolved in the last 5 years, but critical questions remain. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for the addition of ovarian suppression to endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancers considered to be at high risk for recurrence, whereas those with lower-risk cancers seem to have a favorable outcome with tamoxifen alone. Two large randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for extending adjuvant tamoxifen beyond 5 years. Currently the choice of systemic therapy is selected empirically but molecular profiling may, in the near future, provide a more conclusive means of selecting an endocrine therapeutic approach for premenopausal patients. Given that a significant subset of hormone receptor-positive cancers are intrinsically resistant to endocrine agents, as well as the finding that inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 and mammalian target of rapamycin appears to potentially reverse this resistance in patients with metastatic disease, evaluation of these agents in the early-stage setting is ongoing.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansOvaryPremenopauseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, SteroidAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, Steroid

Identifiers

PMID27858538
PMCPMC6469352
OpenAlexW2553820846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.