SynthesisClinical drug investigation2017
Adverse Events and Efficacy of Cixutumumab in Phase II Clinical Trials: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesCixutumumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R). We sought to evaluate the efficacy of cixutumumab in the treatment of cancer, and to comprehensively assess the associated adverse events in phase II clinical trials.
methodsData were collected from PubMed, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov. The improvement on progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We also carried a meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the incidence of adverse events.
resultsThe adverse events that were mentioned most frequently were hyperglycemia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. The most frequent adverse events were hyponatremia (40.28%), fatigue (35.18%), and skin rash (35.11%). Results showed that cixutumumab treatments did not benefit PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83-1.26, p = 0.979). The complete response (CR) was rarely seen in phase II trials.
conclusionsCixutumumab was well tolerated when used alone and in combination therapies, but its antitumor activity was low in the existing phase II clinical trials. An acceptable incidence of adverse effects supports further investigation of this drug, provided that it shows antitumor activity in combination with other drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27858328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.