Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27858322›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2017

Patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer: a systematic review.

Jennifer Barsky Reese, Kristen Sorice, Mary Catherine Beach, Laura S Porter, James A Tulsky, Mary B Daly, Stephen J Lepore

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Survivorship, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2017
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Exploring sexual health and function among Malaysian patients with advanced cancer: insights from the EORTC QLQ SH-22 questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Addressing sexual health after cancer: whose job is it anyway? Provider practices and communication barriers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the use of a youth specific screening tool in hematological cancer care: perspectives from young adult patients and healthcare professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nurses' attitudes toward addressing sexual health in their professional practice within cancer care: a Danish cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer Barsky ReeseCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, 4th Floor, Young Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. Jennifer.Reese@fccc.edu.
Kristen SoriceCancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, 4th Floor, Young Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Mary Catherine BeachDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Laura S PorterDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 90399, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
James A TulskyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, DA-2016A, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Mary B DalyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, 4th Floor, Young Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Stephen J LeporeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Ritter Annex, 9th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Communication Quality and Patient Outcomes in HIV/AIDS and Substance AbuseK24DA037804 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEACH, MARY CATHERINE · 2015 to 2019
$923k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA037804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer survivors' needs around sexual concerns are often unmet. The primary objective of this systematic review was to examine the prevalence of and factors associated with patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in cancer.

methodsUsing PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases for peer-reviewed quantitative research papers (2000-2015) in cancer samples. Search terms across three linked categories were used (sexuality, communication, and cancer). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Sexual Function Guidelines were used as a framework to categorize communication reported in each study.

resultsTwenty-nine studies from 10 countries (29 % in USA) were included. Studies assessed patients only (21), providers only (4), and both (4). Communication measures differed across studies and many lacked validity data. When reported by patients or providers, the average prevalence of discussing potential treatment effects on sexual function was 50 (60 % for men and 28 % for women) and 88 %, respectively. As reported by patients or providers, respectively, assessing patients' sexual concerns (10 and 21 %) and offering treatments (22 and 17 %) were measured in fewer studies and were reported less frequently. Both patients and providers (28 and 32 %, respectively) reported a low prevalence of other non-specific communication. Greater prevalence of communication was associated with male patient gender and more years of provider experience.

conclusionsSexual issues go unaddressed for many cancer survivors, particularly women. Both patient and provider interventions are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Enhancing patient-provider communication about sexual concerns through evidence-based interventions could improve patient sexual function and quality of life.

Indexed as

AgedCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSexual BehaviorSurvivorsCancerCommunicationPatient-provider communicationSexual functionSexual health

Identifiers

PMID27858322
PMCPMC5357584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.