ReviewEuropean journal of epidemiology2017
Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
Review in European journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Utilization of Race and Ethnicity in Major Epidemiology Journals, 1995-2018: A Systematic Review.American journal of epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- Synthesizing evidence from the earliest studies to support decision-making: To what extent could the evidence be reliable?Research synthesis methods · 2022Pooled it
- Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials.Brazilian journal of physical therapyTrial
- Confidence regions for multiple outcomes, effect modifiers, and other multiple comparisons.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Trends in the distribution of P values in epidemiology journals: a statistical, P-curve, and simulation study.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of major HIV and AIDS journals, 1987-2022: A systematic review.Global epidemiology · 2025Review
- Conclusions reported in European Orthodontic Congress poster abstracts: are they based on clinical or statistical significance?European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, 1975-2021. A systematic review.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Review
- Reporting of Statistical Inference in Abstracts of Major Cancer Journals, 1990 to 2020.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- The reporting ofPeerJ · 2021Article
- Current use of effect size or confidence interval analyses in clinical and biomedical research.Scientometrics · 2021Article
- Random error units, extension of a novel method to express random error in epidemiological studies.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- Tracing scientific reasoning in psychiatry: Reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of top journals 1975-2015.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2018Article
- A Growing Consensus for Change in Interpretation of Clinical Research Evidence.Journal of athletic training · 2018Article
- ImbalanceClinical epidemiology · 2018Article
- P values in display items are ubiquitous and almost invariably significant: A survey of top science journals.PloS one · 2018Article
- Significance testing: Why does it prevail?European journal of epidemiology · 2017Article
- Reporting of confidence intervals, achievement of intended sample size, and adjustment for multiple primary outcomes in randomised trials of physical therapy interventions: an analysis of 100 representatively sampled trials.Brazilian journal of physical therapyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its introduction in the twentieth century, null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), a hybrid of significance testing (ST) advocated by Fisher and null hypothesis testing (NHT) developed by Neyman and Pearson, has become widely adopted but has also been a source of debate. The principal alternative to such testing is estimation with point estimates and confidence intervals (CI). Our aim was to estimate time trends in NHST, ST, NHT and CI reporting in abstracts of major medical and epidemiological journals. We reviewed 89,533 abstracts in five major medical journals and seven major epidemiological journals, 1975-2014, and estimated time trends in the proportions of abstracts containing statistical inference. In those abstracts, we estimated time trends in the proportions relying on NHST and its major variants, ST and NHT, and in the proportions reporting CIs without explicit use of NHST (CI-only approach). The CI-only approach rose monotonically during the study period in the abstracts of all journals. In Epidemiology abstracts, as a result of the journal's editorial policy, the CI-only approach has always been the most common approach. In the other 11 journals, the NHST approach started out more common, but by 2014, this disparity had narrowed, disappeared or reversed in 9 of them. The exceptions were JAMA, New England Journal of Medicine, and Lancet abstracts, where the predominance of the NHST approach prevailed over time. In 2014, the CI-only approach is as popular as the NHST approach in the abstracts of 4 of the epidemiology journals: the American Journal of Epidemiology (48%), the Annals of Epidemiology (55%), Epidemiology (79%) and the International Journal of Epidemiology (52%). The reporting of CIs without explicitly interpreting them as statistical tests is becoming more common in abstracts, particularly in epidemiology journals. Although NHST is becoming less popular in abstracts of most epidemiology journals studied and some widely read medical journals, it is still very common in the abstracts of other widely read medical journals, especially in the hybrid form of ST and NHT in which p values are reported numerically along with declarations of the presence or absence of statistical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27858205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.